funhusker

What if Chubbs Peterson never lost his hand to that alligator?

I wish I was desensitized. The "cringe" look is stuck on my face because of this guy....

I'll try* to save you for $50. But you need to get to Omaha. *medical services are not guaranteed to work.

I know you are trying to be fair. But one was on a hot mic, the other is an "official" statement of the POTUS. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/nov/14/doj-donald-trump-tweets-are-official-statements-of/ To add, I'm not naive enough to believe these men don't use cuss words; and this is far from the most vulgar thing Trump has said or done in official capacity.

It's not obstruction if the attempts don't work.

That is what I was referring to. But there is a big difference between Trumps saying "I may do something" and the WH announcing a press conference.

Please God, let Trump do a press conference later today!

Hey, welcome! And yeah, I feel your pain.....

This is where I'm at. Barr has already made clear the DOJ won't pursue any charges, I can't picture any scenario where that would change. That means this is just going to be a political football that is going to be thrown around for at least the next 18 months, and probably much longer. I also though the insanity around Benghazi and emails would go away after Hillary lost.....ooops!

This is an honest question. Would you rather see a USA without Medicare? I'm not trying to be argumentative, just trying to see where you're coming from.

Is that a typo or will he really be eligible this fall? Good news if true: four games for depth this season and he could still redshirt to help fill the void of the Davis twins and elder Daniels.

We’ll see if he’s still around when NE holds its primary.

^^^^^To be clear, that eyeroll was meant for Trump.

I figured this was the best place to put these soundbites from republican legislators the past few days. Not all sense seems to be lost... Talking about lack of permanent cabinet officials: "This is a non-traditional presidency," Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican and member of the GOP leadership team, when asked about the White House circumventing Congress. "And the President now believes he doesn't need a lot of advisers because he wants to do it himself." Republican Sen. Ron Johnson, the chairman of the Homeland Security Committee, called it "not a good situation." "An acting person is there, after all, for a limited period of time, and you do want to have as much continuity in leadership posts as possible," said Sen. Mitt Romney, a Republican of Utah. "I do think the acting secretary issue is problematic because it doesn't give us as members the oversight that we need to have," said Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, a West Virginia Republican. Talking about the struggle between WH and Congress: "I think there will be continued pressure from Congress to do more," Sen. Cory Gardner, a Republican of Colorado, told CNN. "I think he's trying what he believes is a presidential approach, where many of us look at it and say the President is making this more difficult than what this has to be," said Sen. Mike Rounds, a Republican of South Dakota. About moving asylum seekers to sanctuary cities: Asked if it were a good idea to pursue the sanctuary city idea, Sen. John Kennedy said: "No, not for me." "The President has chosen to use a stick," said Kennedy, a Louisiana Republican. "He may ultimately be right, but I would try and use a carrot too." Putting it another way, Republican Sen. Rick Scott of Florida said Sunday that Trump might just be trying to "make everybody crazy." On Trump's approach to receive funding for border wall: Capito, the appropriator in charge of homeland security funding, said Trump's move is going to make it harder to deal with the border security money in future spending bills. "I'm looking at my bill and I'm going, 'How do we get there?' And I think that's an issue that's going to follow through on subsequent years of funding, and it's going to be a problem," she said.

Can we all just admit that all articles are capable of having facts? Conservative Tree House may have verifiable facts in articles, CNN may have verifiable facts in their articles, Politico may have verifiable facts in their articles. If people in these threads would focus more on the "verifiable" facts within the articles instead of throwing the baby out with the bathwater we'd all be much better off. I'm tired of this never ending pissing match of "my source is better than yours". It is taking this off-topic discussion nowhere.