-
Posts
13,647 -
Joined
-
Days Won
33
Danny Bateman last won the day on August 26 2020
Danny Bateman had the most liked content!
About Danny Bateman
- Birthday 11/21/1991
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Approaching the Great White North
-
Interests
Watching the Huskers tear off the arms of inferior teams and proceed to beat them with them.
Recent Profile Visitors
Danny Bateman's Achievements
Defensive Coordinator (16/21)
11.4k
Reputation
-
The 2024 Presidential Election- The LONG General Election
Danny Bateman replied to TGHusker's topic in Politics & Religion
Does it? I’m pretty sure if you gave them truth serum, wouldn’t most evangelical Trump supporters admit they understand what an amoral cretin he is and they simply don’t care? I mean I don’t interact with many of them but it seems to me most of them don’t mind his personal failings because they’re all in on the “instrument of God” narrative, as ludicrous as that is. I’m sure there are a few who are personally deluded enough to believe he’s a totally a devout, godly Christian. Seems the majority of them realize he isn’t but are willing to make a deal with the devil because he advances their causes and give him judges they like. Oh sweet irony. -
The 2024 Presidential Election- The LONG General Election
Danny Bateman replied to TGHusker's topic in Politics & Religion
In the rape case he had to post the judgment amount plus interest so he could appeal the ruling. So I think you have to put up the full amount if you plan to appeal. Of course in that case he just went right back to defaming her so he willfully jumped right back into legal peril, again. Some folks are just slow learners. -
Back when I was in college in Omaha I'm pretty sure at the Dodge street location they just took the shovel-sized scoop they used for fries and dumped em directly into your bag. It was by far the most fries I've gotten at any burger place ever. Didn't even come close to finishing em.
-
The 2024 Presidential Election- The LONG General Election
Danny Bateman replied to TGHusker's topic in Politics & Religion
Oh come on. Aren’t you being a bit harsh? This Trump fellow seems the reasonable type. I’m sure he carefully considers his words. Do you actually have any evidence he’d deliberately incite anyone? That seems a bit far fetched. -
The 2024 Presidential Election- The LONG General Election
Danny Bateman replied to TGHusker's topic in Politics & Religion
That piece of s#!t has been playing stupid games for a really long time now. It’s high time he win some stupid prizes. Trump has spent his entire adult life f#&%ing around and with any good luck he’s well into the finding out phase. You’re right, I’m not gonna cry any crocodile tears over anything that befalls notorious victim DJT. He can pound sand. -
The 2024 Presidential Election- The LONG General Election
Danny Bateman replied to TGHusker's topic in Politics & Religion
Anybody else care to explain to me how that a$$h@!e is the victim here? I'd really love it explained in greater detail. I really didn't think the "Donald J. Trump, perpetual victim" movement needed more steam, but it chugs along. -
The 2024 Presidential Election- The LONG General Election
Danny Bateman replied to TGHusker's topic in Politics & Religion
So your natural instinct to get even with the evil leftist hypocrites is to rush to the defense of the fascist a$$h@!e. Got it. -
The 2024 Presidential Election- The LONG General Election
Danny Bateman replied to TGHusker's topic in Politics & Religion
Good god man. It's way easier to be upset about the complete weirdo spouting fascist incitement than the damn headlines. -
You argue the silliest points and just willingly sidestep anything that isn't explicitly spelled out for you. I get it, it makes your arguments easier. Here's the problem: whether you care to acknowledge it or not, a growing sentiment within the base of your party is that Russia isn't that bad. They're just taking back what's theirs. The other side are the aggressors. They're trying to uphold conservative christian values. Or any other number of ridiculous arguments I've heard that they're not really a threat and other entities are much more clear and present dangers to us as a nation. Peak ridiculousness i that notion that Russia is constrained under Trump/Republicans generally and only aggressive under Democrats because they're more afraid of the tougher Republicans. Hell, if I go up a few posts you're using a version of this argument. GOP electeds realize these dynamics and exploit them for their own benefit because their voters are stupid enough to believe this crap. They're not advancing Russian interests because they care about Russia. They just know their voters are utter rubes and they're happy to make them useful idiots if it keeps them in their cushy Washington gigs. It's bad for the world and it's damaging our democracy.
-
-
I think everyone of all political stripes can pretty roundly agree Don Lemon sucks. This just seems like a story of two uber douches trying to out-douche each other, right?
-
Isn't arguing the rich already pay enough in income taxes kind of a red herring? Don't the ultra wealthy realize the vast majority of their wealth gains through sources that aren't taxable as income anyway?
-
Political superfans are just deeply, deeply weird people. It doesn't really matter what team, though Trumpers for sure seem more prone to it in today's political climate. There's a person who lives a couple blocks away from us who has no less than probably a half dozen (I'm guessing more, I haven't counted) Trump-themed flags draped all over their fence facing the street. Down that street is somebody else proudly rocking a "God, Guns and Trump" flag. Comparatively, I've got a Biden bumper sticker. I'll put up a yard sign of the candidates we're supporting in elections. But it's not some central part of my identity and I don't feel the need to buy a bunch of custom swag to show everyone how big a fan I am. What the hell happens to people they get this f#&%ing weird?
-
Well I think you answered your own question here…
-
Yeah SCOTUS royally screwed the timeline of everything up, multiple times. It might sound harsh, but anybody that doesn’t view SCOTUS as a decidedly political body doing things with political ends in mind is a moron or being intellectually dishonest.