Jump to content


Atbone95

Members
  • Posts

    5,071
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Atbone95

  1. 1 hour ago, Decked said:

    Fong bomb 6/10 to N 

    Interesting, given the video above he states he's not committing until December signing day. Maybe Fong just likes where we sit! 

     

    Said in the video most of his offers are for OLB. We like him at WR but have talked about both, he's looking forward to watching both Mickey Joseph and Mike Dawson coach at practice this weekend.

  2. 19 hours ago, RichardHangslow said:

    Hey I was wondering how you guys would feel if we had a general conversation thread in each of the recruiting years.... I personally don't like having conversations like the one we are having in a prospect thread because every time we post I think there is new information on the prospect.  Food for thought. 

    You mean like this? 

     

    It exists, just depends if people keep themselves honest. :) 

    • Thanks 1
  3. 2 hours ago, Dr. Strangelove said:

    The talent level of what we recruited out of high school in 2022 and so far in 2023 is flat out not good. So just because this kid is from Nebraska doesn't mean he warrants an offer.

     

    With that being said, the QB we got was recruited to ride the bench and bolster depth anyway, I suppose we could've placated fans by using the roster spot on a local kid.

     

     

    Terrible take lol. "the QB we got was recruited to ride the bench", not even worth engaging with stuff like that. 

    • Plus1 5
  4. Forget where I saw this... Maybe it was Callahan. Anyways, the difference was summed up in man assignment vs zone assignment. 

     

    Austin and previous staff were notorious for zone schemes, where OL blocked to a location and only hit the man/picked up the blitz in that spot/gap. By nature, this is more reactionary - "wait to see who comes into my zone".

     

    Raiola is emphasizing a more man to man approach - fire off the ball to the second level and hit the MLB, for example. That is how I heard the main difference explained, FWIW.  

    • Plus1 3
  5. 2 hours ago, Red Five said:

     

    Is he not on scholarship?  Both the Rivals and OWH scholarship charts show him.  According to his bio, he's been on scholarship since prior to the 2020 season.

     

    If he goes back to a walk-on then great.

    Jackson was on a yearly scholarship, coaches could choose not to renew it - which would probably be fine given NIL opportunities and the GI Bill that he could take advantage of (per the guys at Rivals).

  6. 2 minutes ago, Decked said:

    Just a hunch but I think Tyreke Johnson is another guy I would watch. 
     

    Tate Wildeman as well 

    For me it's always hard to say guys who already transferred in once are going to transfer out. They're screwed, right? In terms of playing time and having to sit out. 

  7. 7 minutes ago, Husker in WI said:

     

    Yeah, I think we lose at least one from each of those groups. I'd love to see them all succeed here but that's just not how the numbers and competition work. Some of theose offensive guys could take a leap with new coaches, but I'd still bet on the guys who have been ahead of them on the depth chart and the handpicked recruits of the new coaches. Wouldn't be shocked if multiple DBs left, but hard to say who until the depth chart shakes out. 

    I wouldn't be surprised if someone like Javin Wright or Braxton Clark (assuming he doesn't win a job) decide to move on. 

  8. My top transfer targets I'm watching after spring: 

    • Yant/Stepp (someone has to leave in that room) 
    • At least one of Will Nixon/Shawn Hardy/Latrell Neville/Kamonte Grimes
    • Alex Conn/Michael Lynn (OL depth would hurt, but they're not contributing)
    • Probably lose 1 of the ILBs (9 guys for 2 spots right now)
    • Tamon Lynum 
    • Plus1 1
  9. 5 hours ago, BigRedBuster said:

    So, by my count, we have 16 HS commits and 12 transfers.  If we get Allen and Bonner, the would be 18 HS and 12 Transfers.

     

    Not a bad group from where we were sitting at the beginning of the season.

    Need to go take a look at @Mavric's scholarship chart he maintains. I'd love to know just how many we're going to have to process/get to walk-on for a semester to get back down...

  10. 2 hours ago, Treand3 said:

    Agreed. Mo had better top end speed but Allen looks to be better in the short area. He's better put together as well.

    +1, Allen looks to lack some top end speed to put it away after he breaks out. That, or he's just even more cocky than he already appears and he runs slow on purpose lol. Half of his runs are him turning around at the 30 and starting to slow down. 

     

    Hey, I'll take some RB confidence. 

×
×
  • Create New...