some game theory

[norcalbugeat]

I really have no clue on who TO will bring in. however, i think it will be whatever a million bucks can bring you in this day and age. so given that, i think you can narrow the list down and then start to analyze each candidate's staffs.. So here are my "speculations". Can others chime in on each respective staff - who would they bring in and their strenghts and weaknesses ? in no order:

 

 

Paul Johnson: great O, leaky D (it's navy so i understand)

 

Jim Grobe: good O scheme, could be better on D (ACC been kinda down so is he really that good)

 

Turner Gill: not proven - I liked his O when i watched Buffalo (unproven but I'd take a chance)

 

Bo Pelini: stong D, who'd he bring in on O (quick tempered but I think we need fire)

 

Gary Patterson: Great D, O has been up and down (could recruit TX on a much bigger platform)

[tattooedhusker]

Please God NO Gary Patterson!!!

[norcalbugeat]

I really have no clue on who TO will bring in. however, i think it will be whatever a million bucks can bring you in this day and age. so given that, i think you can narrow the list down and then start to analyze each candidate's staffs.. So here are my "speculations". Can others chime in on each respective staff - who would they bring in and their strenghts and weaknesses ? in no order:

 

 

Paul Johnson: great O, leaky D (it's navy so i understand)

 

Jim Grobe: good O scheme, could be better on D (ACC been kinda down so is he really that good)

 

Turner Gill: not proven - I liked his O when i watched Buffalo (unproven but I'd take a chance)

 

Bo Pelini: stong D, who'd he bring in on O (quick tempered but I think we need fire)

 

Gary Patterson: Great D, O has been up and down (could recruit TX on a much bigger platform)

 

OK - he's off the list.... Now how about the other 4 ?