sarge87 Posted January 1, 2008 Share Posted January 1, 2008 I'm all for musicians getting paid for their work, but this is beginning to be a cash cow for litigation happy lawyers. I've left the links to the story below. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,319276,00.html http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/12/r...ding-indus.html http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...7122800693.html Here's the copy of the legal brief in .pdf form. http://www.ilrweb.com/viewILRPDF.asp?filen...pplementalBrief Quote Link to comment
bennychico11 Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 I agree...ridiculous. Just a way lawyers are trying to get more money. However, I think pretty soon they'll adopt something similar to what we have for software....allowing us to create backups. Quote Link to comment
huskerguy Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 where do they get those numbers from... $9000 each for 24 songs? Quote Link to comment
huskeraddict Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 What the RIAA doesn't seem to get through their thick, moneymaking skulls is that they get more exposure through music sharing. If I'm in Best Buy and I see a CD by some band I don't know, chances are I won't buy it because I have no idea if I'll like it or not. However, if I hear one of their songs that someone has on their iPod, maybe I'll go buy their CD because I'll know if I like them. Quote Link to comment
DaveH Posted January 14, 2008 Share Posted January 14, 2008 Yea, that'll fly. Not. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.