Hunter94 Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 it isn't very glamorous and little has been said about the kicking game, which was pitiful last year, but this kid could win some close games for us as a freshman...i think we will be damn glad we got him hunter Quote Link to comment
hoyamannn Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 Definitely agree there. Our kickers were a liability last year, and I don't understand why Sandro kept getting thrown out there. Quote Link to comment
Benard Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 Definitely agree there. Our kickers were a liability last year, and I don't understand why Sandro kept getting thrown out there. No idea either. David Dyches got screwed over on that one. I have a feeling he might be better than condgon this year as well but Condgon will still kick. Quote Link to comment
DaveH Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 If getting screwed means getting beat out by a kicker that is plain better, then yea, he is going to get screwed. David Dyches might be the kicker come fall. Hell, they both might see time. That wouldn't surprise me. A kicker that could make kicks could have made the difference between winning and losing a couple games this past year. A dicussion on the idea that the staff is going to automatically put their recruits ahead of existing players because they recruited them is a futile. Quote Link to comment
Hunter94 Posted March 1, 2005 Author Share Posted March 1, 2005 DaveH makes my only point.........a good kicker could have gotten us a couple wins and into a bowl game last year. i don't care who kicks this year, i am simply stating this guy may be the answer, maybe not......at least we made an attempt to upgrade the kicking game. hunter Quote Link to comment
Benard Posted March 1, 2005 Share Posted March 1, 2005 If getting screwed means getting beat out by a kicker that is plain better, then yea, he is going to get screwed. David Dyches might be the kicker come fall. Hell, they both might see time. That wouldn't surprise me. A kicker that could make kicks could have made the difference between winning and losing a couple games this past year. A dicussion on the idea that the staff is going to automatically put their recruits ahead of existing players because they recruited them is a futile. If the best player is going to kick then why didn't dyches kick last year. He was far better than Deangelis. Quote Link to comment
Pedro Guerrero Posted March 1, 2005 Share Posted March 1, 2005 If the best player is going to kick then why didn't dyches kick last year. He was far better than Deangelis. If you ask me both of them were/are average or below average. If this kid pans out it will be an upgrade. Quote Link to comment
DaveH Posted March 1, 2005 Share Posted March 1, 2005 If the best player is going to kick then why didn't dyches kick last year. He was far better than Deangelis. If you ask me both of them were/are average or below average. If this kid pans out it will be an upgrade. What he said. They both didn't perform well last year. Sure Dyches kicked comparatively well in 2003. But that was 2003. The staff at one time wanted to use both kickers last year, DeAngelis for short range and Dyches for longer range, but that plan never saw a time to really use it IMO. Never the less, we need a kicker who can kick it through the uprights when it counts. Consistently. And considering Congdon's coaches, who have coached some of the greatest kickers, think pretty highly of him, I have high expectations. Quote Link to comment
Benard Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 If the best player is going to kick then why didn't dyches kick last year. He was far better than Deangelis. If you ask me both of them were/are average or below average. If this kid pans out it will be an upgrade. What he said. They both didn't perform well last year. Sure Dyches kicked comparatively well in 2003. But that was 2003. The staff at one time wanted to use both kickers last year, DeAngelis for short range and Dyches for longer range, but that plan never saw a time to really use it IMO. Never the less, we need a kicker who can kick it through the uprights when it counts. Consistently. And considering Congdon's coaches, who have coached some of the greatest kickers, think pretty highly of him, I have high expectations. How many did dyches miss? I remember making the one he kicked and he did pretty well in 2003. Quote Link to comment
Pedro Guerrero Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 If the best player is going to kick then why didn't dyches kick last year. He was far better than Deangelis. If you ask me both of them were/are average or below average. If this kid pans out it will be an upgrade. What he said. They both didn't perform well last year. Sure Dyches kicked comparatively well in 2003. But that was 2003. The staff at one time wanted to use both kickers last year, DeAngelis for short range and Dyches for longer range, but that plan never saw a time to really use it IMO. Never the less, we need a kicker who can kick it through the uprights when it counts. Consistently. And considering Congdon's coaches, who have coached some of the greatest kickers, think pretty highly of him, I have high expectations. How many did dyches miss? I remember making the one he kicked and he did pretty well in 2003. He started off well in 03 and struggled at the end. Wasn't he like 14-21. Not very good if you ask me. He also can not make it to the endzone on kickoffs. Quote Link to comment
Benard Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 If the best player is going to kick then why didn't dyches kick last year. He was far better than Deangelis. If you ask me both of them were/are average or below average. If this kid pans out it will be an upgrade. What he said. They both didn't perform well last year. Sure Dyches kicked comparatively well in 2003. But that was 2003. The staff at one time wanted to use both kickers last year, DeAngelis for short range and Dyches for longer range, but that plan never saw a time to really use it IMO. Never the less, we need a kicker who can kick it through the uprights when it counts. Consistently. And considering Congdon's coaches, who have coached some of the greatest kickers, think pretty highly of him, I have high expectations. How many did dyches miss? I remember making the one he kicked and he did pretty well in 2003. He started off well in 03 and struggled at the end. Wasn't he like 14-21. Not very good if you ask me. He also can not make it to the endzone on kickoffs. I didn't say he should kick off, Koch should do that. He did that great in 2003 but never got the chance under callahan. Dyches from 40 in is pretty consistent and deangelis wasn't. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.