Caven Posted May 21, 2010 Share Posted May 21, 2010 I didn't put ND with Texas and AM because that would violate my no more than 2 teams in a pod rule Also ND plays Michigan and Michigan State every year right now (as well as Purdue) so it seemed logical to let them keep those rivalry games which ended up necessitating that pod. Given that each pod gets paired with another pod every year, having two heavy pods that are always opposite each other and only play cross divisional games against each other isn't a bad way to go imo. Quote Link to comment
Mrstickball Posted May 25, 2010 Share Posted May 25, 2010 It's nice to seek that Huskers, Aggies and most Buckeyes agree who should belong in the conference if we expand to 16. As an OSU fan (Ohio State), I don't know what I'd think if we did get ND, TAMU, Texas, NU and MU. I think it'd be hugely beneficial for our football clout, as we'd add 3 of the best programs in history. We'd have the 6 of the best 10 ever, and hold the top 3. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.