Hunter94 Posted April 26, 2011 Share Posted April 26, 2011 i think the whole LB deal will revolve around whether we play a 4-3 or 3-4 the majority of the time. it's going to be interesting and i expect the D to give a lot of different looks. Quote Link to comment
Lyons in the Sea of Red. Posted April 26, 2011 Share Posted April 26, 2011 I would say probably whaley. Everything I've seen of fisher had not been good. In the spring game Rex made him look like his feet were stuck in mud. His body type is not suit for a big10 linebacker imo. He is too tall and lanky. To me it doesn't matter if you can lay someone out. Eric Martin could, but he was rarely in the right place. Fisher has good instincts and just needs to be around the ball to be successful. Fisher doesnt do either. He may be around the ball but he does nothing to benefit. Fisher met Rex on 2 different occasions that I can remember in the spring game, and Rex, typically not known for his ability to make people miss, made Fish pick up his jock. Quote Link to comment
blasted_imposter Posted April 26, 2011 Share Posted April 26, 2011 Don't count out Fisher. Prior to injury (and Lavonte's emergence), he was our most solid linebacker. This. Performance is within the context of the scheme, within which the team D becomes much greater than the sum of its parts. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.