Benard Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 your right, he was about like a pat ricketts or mcpherson average. I agree he improved somewhat but by far not what I call a huge impact or a difference maker. You crack me up. I don't wanna know what some of those Michigan receivers would have done if he wasn't on the field. Was there a completion thrown against him in that game? I'll have to bust out my Alamo Bowl DVD from huskervideos.com. I doubt Ricketts or McPherson woud have made that INT. So, Benard, how do you ascertain whether a corner has had a good game? Number of INT's? In that case, yea, he didn't have many. Could be because he was covering his guy well and the QB wasn't that dumb. Bowman was suppose to be a sure tackler/hard hitter which I didn't see much of. He was suppose to bait guys and get picks which I think he had 1 maybe 2. He did have a good pick in bowl game, I give him that. But overall he was just average and couldn't even start for half the year. If thats the best juco in the nation i guess so be it. Quote Link to comment
DaveH Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 You didn't answer the questions. Sounds like you call him average because he didn't live up to the hype. Quote Link to comment
Benard Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 You didn't answer the questions. Sounds like you call him average because he didn't live up to the hype. I call him average because he didn't play like a 5 star player or number 1 juco. He was an average defensive back. Not bad but not great. Quote Link to comment
benjibean1 Posted January 13, 2006 Share Posted January 13, 2006 because he wasnt a sure tackler...come on now... That point you are trying to make is very weak and cannot be proved. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.