Jump to content


Nebraska should be able to attract top candidates


Recommended Posts

OWH: http://www.omaha.com/news/metro/in-search-for-bo-pelini-s-successor-at-nu-talent/article_d2957daf-0fc6-5a47-8fed-91f2ab104a08.html

 

"It’s been said that the head football coaching job at the University of Nebraska isn’t as attractive as it once was...Don’t believe it, say three college athletics consultants, a former coach-turned-TV analyst and two other network analysts."

 

LJS: http://journalstar.com/sports/huskers/national-analyst-nu-still-one-of-the-best-jobs-around/article_cee8037c-f854-5fbb-8d1b-e9a1240b47ca.html

 

National analyst: NU still one of the best jobs around

 

  • Fire 1
Link to comment

Yeah, it's weird how this meme gets started. The reasoning is very, very circular.

NU tries out some new coaches who lose in major ways on the field.

NU's prestige falls.

NU fires coach who was one of the causes of the fall in prestige.

Media goes crazy because they can't get a good coach because the prestige has fallen.

 

It's not like prestige of a university is something that just blows in on the wind-- it's built (and maintained) by the people running the program. There are these bizarre throw away excuses like "College football has changed since the 90s." I'm still not sure why that means that a great coach couldn't attract players to this school (Bo did!). There isn't anything innate about the state of Nebraska or the facilities at UNL that make a fall in prestige inevitable. This isn't weather we're talking about-- it's how a program is being run and by whom. It would be like saying, "Oh, the University of Nebraska Medical Center just can't compete anymore because they're in Nebraska and the medical field has changed since the 90s." It doesn't make any sense for anything, but for some reason, the fact that football is different than it was 15-20 years ago means that Nebraska can never have a high-performing program again. It's just a strange, baseless belief that people hold on to... it's almost like a superstition.

 

Football is always different than it was in previous decades. This is not some new thing-- it wasn't in a stasis between the 70s and the 90s; it is always evolving. Just like EVERYTHING! Friggin CORN is different than it was in the 90s. Football isn't magic or special in some way that means that it can change in such a way that it doesn't work at certain latitudes and longitudes any more. It's just something that gets said and repeated until it becomes a truism, so no one wants to defy it for fear of being told they don't know anything about college football.

Link to comment

If I were a top coach I would be beating down the door to come to Nebraska. Great facilities. Great tradition. Enormous fan support. Bottomless pockets. Managable division/conference schedule. (And a well-stocked cupboard of current players).

 

Anyone who thinks otherwise should be immediately removed from consideration. No more #9wins #GoodEnough coaches. No more excuses.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Visit the Sports Illustrated Husker site



×
×
  • Create New...