StPaulHusker

Then I think you're good. But you might be confused? Charges against Washington would be filed in California not in Texas or Nebraska. So by your example, if there is a law against someone misgendering a person in California and you did that from the comfort of your home in Iowa, the charges would be in California. I think you're good if you were in college. The girl in this situation was 15, however.

Are there laws against misgendering people in Iowa?

Perhaps since he SENT it TO California, it's subject to those laws?

Yes. That is exactly what I am saying. This could also be one of Maurice Washington's buddies just goofin and typing on my keyboard, too.

According to the investigation: She is raped (her words) in 2016 in California. It's recorded by the 2 male individuals and sent to people in the school. One of the male individuals was arrested in 2016 for the video distribution. Washington receives the video in 2016. Then he moves to Texas sometime between February 2016 and March 2018. Washington sends the video to the girl in March of 2018. I'm thinking this wasn't a friend goofing around with Washington's phone.

You really are no fun

He sent the video. What he may or may not be charged legally with is irrelevant.

Him sending the video is not one sided

We know he sent at best revenge porn and at worst child pornography.

Maybe we should pick sides. Are you okay with what Washington did to the girl regardless of her age and therefore should be allowed to continue with the team? Or Are you not okay with what he did to the girl regardless of her age and think he shouldn't be on the team? Or Are you not okay with what he did to the girl regardless of her age but you're willing to let it go because he might be a good RB for 2019?

Then you just go from distribution of child porn to "only" revenge porn. Which is still a problem.

Unfortunately, your definition of clean and what some others on here are a universe apart.

Just distributed video of a 15 year old girl having sex. no big deal.

There is only one important fact. He sent the video to the girl with the intent to emotionally harm her. That's not debatable.

I can't agree with this. He did what he did. And he knows he did it. If he didn't know it would possibly go down as child porn charges, I can understand that. But what he did was wrong on many other levels beyond the legal one.

I don't think there needs to be a legal penalty for there to be a team penalty. He should not be on the team if Frost is true to his "high character" standards.

Receiving it on his phone isn't the guilty part. Keeping it and sending it to the girl and calling her a hoe is the guilty part. I think you've answered your own question

Listen. Even if charges aren't filed against him, he is a very low character guy sending the video to the girl. That alone should be enough to have him off the team.

It was said in jest. Simmer down. You're not the PC police

Allowed to keep playing

Agree and agree

Well the good news is we can dispense with the notion that Frost only wants high character guys on the team.

Agree to disagree

Good bye Maurice. Next man up

Ran some calculations and couldn't give a f#&% less what you think.