BigRedBuster

4 hours ago, ZRod said:

That right there is why they're so awful. A company should value and work to keep it's employees and customers. If they can't do that that's their problem, not a legal one.

I don’t necessarily agree. 

38 minutes ago, Scarlet said:

But then you read lucid and well crafted totally sane posts like below and you wonder..."maybe giving him another go at the most powerful position in the world is a good idea".

 

 

This changed me. I’m buying a MAGA hat and quitting my job to follow him around waving a TRUMP flag. I’m going to save ‘Merica. 
 

I implore you all to do the same.  

15 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

I’m pretty sure you could never steal trade secrets and still won’t be able to.  

The biggest area in my industry that I’ve seen it used is with sales managers. Not the regional sales managers, but the national sales manager for the company. The NC  is that they can’t call on customers over a certain size for a certain period of time. 
 

Like I said, I’ve never used it (mainly because I haven’t had to). But, I really don’t have a problem with something like that. Hey, the sales manager can still work in the industry, just certain customers are off limits to actively call on. Also, if the customer calls the other company and wants to buy, that’s fine. 
 

This also points politely a main reason why I don’t have a problem with this change, they’ve always been almost impossible to enforce. You have to have some pretty damning evidence. 
 

I did hire a VP of production that had an NC with his previous company but, it was just that he couldn’t work with a certain raw material. 

48 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

Did he happen to say why he voted against said bill? 

Don’t know.  But he should explain.  
 

Or, it’s because the nominee didn’t want it. Since, that’s why it died.  

58 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

 I don’t believe believe the ruling changed the law in this?   Did I miss something? 

Hope not. 

He’s on fire. 
 

Just now, Archy1221 said:

This is a good thing imo.  
 

 

I've never signed one and I've never asked someone to sign one.  So, this really doesn't affect me that much.

However, there are some industries where they are having an "oh f#&%" moment.  Mostly in technology.  And, I can see their point.  You have certain people that you pay to develop certain things....they can just jump ship and take all your secrets with them.  However, I do see the employee's point of view too.

Why would he be doing this?

@teachercd  Well, SOUNW all of a sudden thinks it's hot stuff today, up 35%.  To bad it has to go another 44% for me to break even.  

19 minutes ago, Red Five said:

 

He should just be a walk-on getting some small NIL.  I get he is a freak athlete from Nebraska, but he had 0 D1 offers out of high school.  And in 2 years at Montana he had 1 tackle.

I'll leave that judgement up to the coaches. 

I agree with @Mavric that it's probably all NIL, just a matter of how much and is he happy with it.  

I hope we get him.

16 hours ago, Mavric said:

 

This seems like it's just a matter of him finding out what kind of offer we are going to give him.  Is he on scholarship?  Is he just on NIL?

Then, he will be N.

This is his MO.  If he accuses someone of something against him, assume he's actually the one doing it.

48 minutes ago, JJ Husker said:

 

As my guy always reminds me; It’s time in the market, not timing the market.

I have my 401K that I very very seldom ever look at.

I have an old IRA that I started when I owned a different business.  That one I play around in.  I tend to buy a stock and hardly ever sell.

10 minutes ago, Mavric said:

 

LOL...he won't.

32 minutes ago, knapplc said:

Not Fox News lying again!

 

 

Trump is trying so hard to get thrown in jail.  Fox is doing his bidding by stirring up anger over it in his base.

13 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

At what point do these clowns start getting charged with civil rights violations???

 

 

It needs to start now.