cornographic

If you can't come into a thread and discuss something like music in a civil manor, isn't that more of an indication of probably a personal problem you have more than anything? This is a Metal Sucks thread, there is little pretention toward civility. And funny, that any Metal Heads might be concerned about civility.

Jamire Calvin is a WR that weighs 144 lbs and 4.66 40. We want this guy because...?

Ha, perfect name for a Metal band. Future and Current Idiots would be more precise.

What was that? Well, I'm sorry you're so upset about your sh**ty "music"(noise) getting lambasted by me, but really, not my prob, I'm doing this as a labor of love, and a tantrum isn't going to help you. And, you are currently speaking to the:

They've been doing all kinds of voter suppression around the country, Pubs especially.

Sez the guy who mocks others that dont follow metal for not being aware of certain groups from specific sub-genres; sez the guy who posts multiple pics from his collectuon of specific sub-genres; sez the guy who obtusely states an obvious correlation from the posts of others. You're a self-loathing emo, we get it. Sorry, gotta put ya on iggy, yer bein' too much a pain in the ass....not to mention your disrespect for your elders. This is a "Metal Sucks" thread, not a "Metal is great", thread, plz stick to the topic.

tOSU already has 2 5*s, 7 4*s, and 3 3*s for a #1 ranking, I think they've got the momentum.

I rate this a solid 4 outta 5 *s in terms of Metal suckage as the noise is particularly noisy--only listened for a few seconds--and the graphics particularly stupid. Well done.

Never been a huge fan of Space. Why? No air. I prefer air. I like the pretty pics, though. Which reminds me, saw this doc where they were thinking about colonizing the moon--our moon. Well, they figured they'd need some water up there--in addition to air--so all the best and brightest @ NASA and what not set up a yuge lab where they would attempt to extract water from moon rocks. Can't quite remember where they got the moon rocks, but they had enough to give it a whirl and about a zillion $ later, they did, in fact, extract about 1/2 cup of H2O from a big pile of moon rocks at which point, being the best and brightest that they were, concluded that they couldn't get, "water from a stone", so to speak, way too friggin' expensive, and it also wasn't worth the hassle trying to ship fresh H2O up from the Earth, not to mention the impending water shortage on Earth, sooooooo....project scrapped, no moon colonies anytime soon. They're still selling 1 way tickets to Mars, though, it seems....they really want to colonize space and transport all the human problems up there, I s'pose, but for me, again, not a fan of space, no air, no water, no gravity. I like it here just fine, tyvm.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/19/politics/new-york-primary-voter-problem-polls-sanders-de-blasio/

These 3 posts tell me all I need to know about you. Ok, I give up, what would that be?

Your hatred for those who don't share your outlook is noted but there are many charitable/aid organizations that provide help around the world that are not faith-based. Imagine trying to help your fellow man because its the right thing to do rather than for getting a gold star from your deity. You are way off base. None of that was said wt hatred. It was to point out the obvious - churches were doing good well before govt got involved in redistribution policies.- and wtout the need of a gold star- good grief - you have zero understanding of faith based compassion I didn't say there aren't any non-church based charitable organizations - that isn't the topic of both the thread or my post. And your last statement is wayyyyyy over the top. Your hatred for the church appears to be showing through your post. It is hard for you to acknowledge the good that the churches do because of your bias against them instead you go way off to left field. I don't hate any church...unlike you who made it obvious that 'true religion is bible-based'. Instead I don't care for the arrogant religious person who takes shots at those that don't share his faith because he is insecure about it. And its not hard for me to acknowledge when a church does good, which is why I applauded how religion can get its followers to rally for a cause. But types like you can't see that because they are blinded by petty hatred for that what is different. Its unfortunate that you can't understand that many people do good works without needing religion or a God to guide/force them. You are way off base - I don't harbor any hatred and I fully acknowledge that non-religious, non-church based organizations and individuals do good work. I also didn't say true religion was Bible base - Christian Churches are but other religions are not. And other religions can do good works as well. That wasn't the subject however- you moving the ball so you can fix blame and label (hatred) anyone who wants to defend the church non-tax status. Keep your focus on the subject matter instead of rabbit trails that are falsely assumed. The subject of this thread was taxing churches and I'm only responding that churches provide a service to the community that far exceeds the benefit of taxing them. And taxing them would diminishes the funds to carry on those activities. So stop the hate name calling - it gets you know where. I have no 'petty' hatred for what is different. Check your own heart as it appears you think I'm different in my views - thus labeling as blinded by petty hatred when you know nothing of me. That seems pretty blinded to me. I've done a lot of volunteer work wt a lot of people far different than I - race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, etc. Speaking of benefits, a famous guy once said that, "religion is the opiate of the masses..." Do you see this as a benefit? You mean The famous guy who's communist ideology lead to the slaughter of untold millions last century? Ok we won't get anywhere wt this discussion but finger point. These discussions evolve into shouting over each other and I don't have the time or desire to do so. It isn't my job to change your views and visa versa and throwing insults around like Moesker does is childish. Not playing that game. Have fun wt the rest of the thread. Yeah, well you're wrong, neither Marx nor his philosophy slaughtered anybody, dictators did/do, capitalists did/do, fascists did/do. Marxism is essentially a critique of capitalism, but you'd have to read Marx to know that. But I don't have time to go into that for the millionth time. Sure, various religious groups, at their best, do do valuable charitable work, w/o which, many folks in the capitalist system would go unserved and perhaps die. However, religions are also responsible for a great deal of mental abuse, especially of the young, just ask anybody who has escaped their religion. But the main point is, the religions have never done anything to question or contradict or expose the inherent causes of poverty that exist in the capitalistic system in the 1st place. And, the religions keep in place a hierarchical, theocratic ruling class of sorts. So, in that respect, Marx was right, religion helps keep the masses from throwing off their chains and overturning the exploitive system. They just keep "praying". That's what that's about. If and when religions fully embrace the cause of the masses, then they will actually be of full value. Pope Francis is perhaps the 1st Pope ever who is actually contradicting capitalism--good for him.

And we're concerned about Kevin Williams' opinion because....?

Your hatred for those who don't share your outlook is noted but there are many charitable/aid organizations that provide help around the world that are not faith-based. Imagine trying to help your fellow man because its the right thing to do rather than for getting a gold star from your deity. You are way off base. None of that was said wt hatred. It was to point out the obvious - churches were doing good well before govt got involved in redistribution policies.- and wtout the need of a gold star- good grief - you have zero understanding of faith based compassion I didn't say there aren't any non-church based charitable organizations - that isn't the topic of both the thread or my post. And your last statement is wayyyyyy over the top. Your hatred for the church appears to be showing through your post. It is hard for you to acknowledge the good that the churches do because of your bias against them instead you go way off to left field. I don't hate any church...unlike you who made it obvious that 'true religion is bible-based'. Instead I don't care for the arrogant religious person who takes shots at those that don't share his faith because he is insecure about it. And its not hard for me to acknowledge when a church does good, which is why I applauded how religion can get its followers to rally for a cause. But types like you can't see that because they are blinded by petty hatred for that what is different. Its unfortunate that you can't understand that many people do good works without needing religion or a God to guide/force them. You are way off base - I don't harbor any hatred and I fully acknowledge that non-religious, non-church based organizations and individuals do good work. I also didn't say true religion was Bible base - Christian Churches are but other religions are not. And other religions can do good works as well. That wasn't the subject however- you moving the ball so you can fix blame and label (hatred) anyone who wants to defend the church non-tax status. Keep your focus on the subject matter instead of rabbit trails that are falsely assumed. The subject of this thread was taxing churches and I'm only responding that churches provide a service to the community that far exceeds the benefit of taxing them. And taxing them would diminishes the funds to carry on those activities. So stop the hate name calling - it gets you know where. I have no 'petty' hatred for what is different. Check your own heart as it appears you think I'm different in my views - thus labeling as blinded by petty hatred when you know nothing of me. That seems pretty blinded to me. I've done a lot of volunteer work wt a lot of people far different than I - race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, etc. Speaking of benefits, a famous guy once said that, "religion is the opiate of the masses..." Do you see this as a benefit?

ART!

It's, "Mur'ca". 3 syllables is too complex.

Art, ART!

Metal Gramma, lovely: Let out for the day from the Metal nursing home from hell:

Metal fans, so characteristically Neanderthal: Oh, the Horns of Satan, so scary!!! Metal Moms, so hot! Well, you get the idea, oh wait, it's the obligatory Kiss Idiots!!!! That's Moesker on the left vvv, bright future...: Crap, maybe I'm stereotyping.......

Most those "names" look like your above logo ^^^. Now that's quick, corno. Have you always been this quick, or is this something new? Roll out of your coffin this morning? Good for you. Your GF is kinda homely, if I may say.... Yeah, guess I'm a bit slow to the Metal culture and memes, since I hate the stuff and never follow it. Prlly end up putting all the MetalHeaders on iggy when it's all said and done, can't take the derp.

Nice try. All self defense, and psyche preservation. They are the perps. BTW, can someone splain to me the "lawn" reference? lawn1 lôn/ noun noun: lawn; plural noun: lawns an area of short, mown grass in a yard, garden, or park. synonyms: grass, yard, front yard, backyard, dooryard "mowing the lawn" Origin mid 16th century: alteration of dialect laund ‘glade, pasture,’ from Old French launde ‘wooded district, heath,’ of Celtic origin. The current sense dates from the mid 18th century. Oh, so it doesn't mean anything, thanks About as much as your incoherent rant about your perception of music. Haha, good one, you "gotcha" me, eh? Metal is basically semi-skilled noise production, I don't consider it as music. Howsa 'bout we test your "Metal", your commitment to the with a hypothetical. Let's say, for the sake of argument, that there is a Gawd and there is an afterlife. And let's also say, Mr. Moesker Metalhead Truther, that when it comes time for you to throw off this mortal coil you are faced with a choice: do you want Heaven or Hell? Heaven is run by this guy named Jesus and his Dad and Hell is managed by a guy named Lucifer. In Heaven, your comrades will include the likes of former stellar figures like Plato, Aristotle, Michaelangelo, Monet, Galileo, Shakespeare, Thoreau, Emerson, Twain, Steinbeck,etc, with the music of Chopin, Bach, Schumann, Mozart and the like and even the newer hipster sounds of the likes of Glenn Frye, Donald Fagan, Chick Corea, Charlie Byrd, Marvin Gaye, EW&F, David Gilmore, Roger Waters, etc. And don't forget the voluptuous babes. Only problem in Heaven: absolutely no Metal allowed! Not to worry, though, buddy o' pal, since in Hell, along with the Eternal Fire and gnashing of teeths and general lack of clothing and edible food, your comrades will exist exclusively of every baby butchering Metal rocker of every Metalhead band that ever existed, and blaring, scratching, thrashing, writhing Metal is the only noise allowed in Hell. So, which door do you choose when your Maker comes calling? Will it be the Metal free zone called Heaven, or the Metal saturated underworld called Hell? Take all the time you need. What an hysterical rant. Metalhead truther? What does that even mean in your crazy little world? You sound like someone who has gone off his meds and the paranoia is creeping in. Even worse you design a absurd hypothetical that really doesn't have any rationality to it. Donald Fagan? LMFAO!!!! That's what I thought, backed you into a corner. Also figured you wouldn't recognize real musical genius, ok, on to iggy.....

Yeah, it kind of goes "underground" a bit in popularity, depending. Well, since I was there to witness the onset of the various brands of shoes and sports gear, First it was Converse canvass Chuck Taylors, then it kinda went to roundball Pro Keds, which, at the time were all the rage, but were suede and heavy and clunky as hell. Then Puma and Adidas came along with similarly heavy clunky roundball shoes, including the "shelltoe", but their logos were cool, so they too became the rage. Then Nike came along with the Portland Trailblazers and I though it was stupid because it looked like an inverted Puma logo. However, their shoes were more streamlined and lighter, using more finished leather which was used ever since, so Nike just kept going and going until they, with the help of MJ, got yuge. Still not a Nike fan, personally, and also not a fan of the retro, throwback clunky styles of my youth that are recycled in popularity. I used to wear 'em to play roundball--way too heavy. My fav shoes that Adidas ever came out with were the Adi Racer a few years back, ttly cool:

If I'm not wearing my chucks, I'll throw on my red or black addias pair you've pictured above That style was cool, back in about 1970. I think it's really clunky looking today. They were popular like in 03 as well...but the kids now don't know because they were what...5 years old? LOL, i know, right? Well, being an "old" guy, I've seen the fashion industry recycle alotta the same handful of styles about every 10 years or so. Only so many options, I guess.

S'posed to be on fire, ain't it?

So when Trump gets screwed by the system, you tell him to suck it up. But when Bernie gets screwed by the system, you admit it's rigged... It's rigged on the Pub side too, I've never denied it. The difference is, and maybe I haven't made it clear enough, that Drumpf is a big time pc o' sh#t that I was hoping would lose and Bernie is awesome. Guess the People's Revolution will have to continue on from the grassroots up apart from the Dem And Pub Parties. Probably better that way. Hope that clarifies things.