Here's my question: scott has done pretty good at UCF with a team full of 2 and 3 stars, so obviously the system he has maximizes the talent he has to work with. Nebraska is capable of getting better talent than UCF can get, but does that translate to higher rates players or more solich esque types of classes? Would the level of talent that they have in Orlando lead to 10 win seasons here, or is the competition level that much better in the big10 that they would be exposed?
It's a little bit funny if you read the UCF board, they claim that they could win the big10 right now and state it's because of the system, and at the same time say that Nebraska can't get the level of talent to win even with frost leading the team. So I don't know if they're saying that UCF can out recruit us, or if the big10 heavyweights aren't as good as their coach, or if it's a combination of the 2.