NEBRASKANHEAT

Can't hit a guy in the shoulder? Can't point the crown of your helmet at any part of the player and lead head first anymore. I miss the old days. When men were men and paralysis was a considered a justifiable risk if it meant a win.

Oh my God I didn't think I could get any more pumped for this game.. But, that did it!

Texas wasn't on the schedule last year either. I'm sure Crick remembers having played them though. I'm not going to try and translate what he said. I read it as a clear cut. I wasn't trying to twist my own views onto his comments when I titled this thread. I read it and said "oh, well, I guess Crick has made up his mind after all".. Obviously others disagree and that's fine. I just want to make it clear my intentions were not to misrepresent his words.

You mean the NFL that won't be playing next year due to lockout? Do me a favor and don't stop by the 49ers message board. There is a few hundred die hard fans wallowing in the misery of an 0-5 start with their only glimmer of cheer coming from getting Andrew Luck next year in the draft. Your news might push them over the edge.

Exactly. I guess I'm confused as to how others are dismissing it. Seems fairly cut and dry to me. If it was a quote from someone (say an actual senior like Pierre Allen) and mistankingly credited to Crick, then okay. But otherwise, it was Crick saying this is his last season as a Husker. I'm not going to speculate on why he would say it, but he did.

"Our mindset stays the same," senior defensive tackle Jared Crick said. "We don't think, 'This is the last time …' For me and a lot of the guys, it's the last time we're playing anyway." Looks like the writer just assumed Crick was a senior given his comments?

I don't think I'm reading too much into it.. Sounds pretty clear that he's playing this season fully believing it's his last one anyways. Doesn't it?

The emotions of a farewell tour through the Big 12, of leaving behind more than a century's worth of history with the Jayhawks and Cyclones, et al, are lost on the Huskers. "Our mindset stays the same," senior defensive tackle Jared Crick said. "We don't think, 'This is the last time …' For me and a lot of the guys, it's the last time we're playing anyway." My link

I'm may be the chicken little type. But I've watched most every snap out of Texas this year and I'm not convinced they are not still a very good football team. Perhaps even top 10-15.. They just keep killing themselves. Penalties when they get a stop that keeps a drive going. Dropped passes by wide open receivers.. A few things cleaned up here or there and they could have won both the games they lost.. It wouldn't suprise me in the least to see a bye week "re-birth" of Texas on Saturday. I think we beat Texas regardless as we're the better team even if they're not killing themselves with stupid mistakes. But, imo, it would be as wrong to look at Texas's losses any differently than our losses to VT and Iowa st. last year. 1 game vs. a very good opponent where we should have won. And one clunker vs. a bad team we bumbled away. My 2 cents anyways.

Agreed. We don't turn the ball over, we win. Period. Considering the rate we are turning the ball over, this game scares me. I've seen nothing from Texas that worries me. We can grind them down and eventually put them away. But if we turn the ball over, we got problems.

I was glad to see so many Husker fans cheering the Jackrabbits as they walked off the field. They deserved it. They played a heck of a game.

I hope you're right. I've watched the game twice (and rewound certain plays numerous times) and to me, it wasn't a case of a team just over looking someone, as a team that was confused at times and manhandled at others. Not sure what overlooking has to do with a qb locking on and telegraphing every throw, or skipping balls, or an offensive linemen getting blown off the line. I'm sure there is some of that, but I wouldn't discount this all as an overlook. Remember, the offensive line was horribble last year and Martinez has not yet proven he can be a good thrower. So to chalk it up as a fluke and not notice there are some real concerns STILL with the offense, is short sighted imo.

Hey Knapplc, I didn't mention Sheffield because he's not on any future or current NFL radars that I've heard of. (could be wrong) In fact, he's not even the starter this year. And wasn't the suppossed to be the starter vs. us last year.. He had a much better game then most have had, but if I recall correctly, we still held them to the least amount of yards of any team last year. The score was so lopsided because of the turnovers and special teams play.. Definently had the most success of anyone against us last year. But like you say, I'd love another shot against them with an offense capable of eating some clock nad giving our defense a rest.

I think you summed it up in your first sentence. "he's a decent oc".. I agree he's decent, but I'm not sure I'm willing to settle for decent. If he can look like a mastermind when a guy like Martinez is playing and look like a pop warner coach when Lee is playing, there's going to be far too many extreme highs and lows in his tenure here. I understand there will always be some fluctuation based on talent, but not to the extremes of the last few years.

I think you can still have issues with what happened last year and praise him for this year.. (if this offense turns out to be as good as it looks this year) My issue was injuries and talent completely shut this offense down last year. It came to an unacceptable level of ineptness.. A great OC would have figured out how to generate some offense last year. I can accept there will be years where the offense will be up or down. But, we should never be falling down to the 100's nationally in offensive production.. If we do, he's to blame. Just as he's to be credited when we're good.

We ran three INTs back in the last two games, so I think that's just a little bit off. Two vs. Enderle and one vs. Locker. You're right.. I missed the second one vs. Enderle.. Prince against OU was 1 yard away from making it a 4th one too..

I should also mention in those 6 games. Those qb's have thrown the same amount of touchdown passes *2* to their team as they have thrown touchdown passes to our defense! Pass at your own risk. You have a 1 in 9 chance to throw a td vs. getting intercepted and are just as likely to throw a pick 6 than to get 6 for your team..

Exactly. Much of our politics is dominated by strong personal feelings about the PERSON . . . and not so much about their beliefs. I know people from English classes years ago who would object to George W. Bush saying that we shouldn't let babies starve to death. My own father admits that he is angered just by the sight of Barack Obama. Neither reaction is rational. Unfortunately, rational thought looks more rare each and every day. Well said. It just hit me as I was listening to him talk that if I had a cell phone camera and recorded it, then picked out the soundbytes I wanted to and posted them on here under the heading "Obama supporter talks about what's wrong with America" there would be a ton of "pinko liberal, socialist, marxist," type comments.. Of course now that we know it was Osborne talking, it's just a great man being lead by a higher calling trying to teach accountability to our fellow man.. (And btw, there were kids in the room. Could you imagine what people would do with a video of Obama talking in front of kids about how greed is what's wrong with this country and how we need to care less about material goods? Glen Beck's head would explode.) I think the big difference is Obama has made statements that show he favors wealth redistribution and social programs, TO on the other hand, voted, and speaks more towards hard work, and helping your fellow man through charities, Church and volunteerism. These statements are not made in a vacuum, so their political and social views would rightly be applied. I think both Obama and TO are right about greed affecting our country, how we solve the issue is where they differ. Obama favors taking the money from people he thinks have to "much" (how much is to much by the way) and giving it to the poor, while TO seems to think you should willing give it to help others, through local services etc. Your post isn't entirely accurate. You make it seem like Obama is exceptional in his politics . . . and I hate to break it to people but he is largely left-center. He is not a radical by any means. Any politician who has voted yes on a federal budget in the last 50+ years is in favor of "wealth-redistribution." That's basically what a progressive tax structure is. Take more from those who have more . . . and the poor tend to benefit disproportionately from social programs. It just annoys the hell out of me when people talk like this is a new or radical idea. It's not. Claiming otherwise is a damned lie. I dont get where you are coming from. I pointed out that Obama and TO have different political and philosophical ideals. Obama has made many statements to show that, so has TO. I never said Obamas ideas where new, they are not. The op was stating if you were to credit TO's quotes to Obama people whould say he is a socialist or something, and I agree. Just as everything W said proved he was nothing more than a warmongering, ultra-conservative, illiterate jack hole, Obama has now been pigeon holed as a quasi Socialist. Fair enough. Really, I was more trying to point out how the modern "sound byte" and as you say "pigeon holed" media can make anything look anti or pro American. I'm not Obama groupie and didn't like Bush either. I just can't stand the way either side can take someones words and manipulate them totally out of context to favor their hate for the speaker... I don't pretend to be an economics proffesor and really don't have any clue on the best way to tax-redistribute or generally help this economy. I've heard some really smart guys with some really serious degrees argue on both sides. Who am I to say who's right? I do know though that neither "side" really has fixing the situation as a priority and are more than happy to watch us all burn if it means they can get elected by promosing to pee on us and put the fire out.

I'm looking at guys who are either already in the NFL or that I've read or have heard are on future NFL prospect lists.. I might be missing some so feel free to correct or add to it if I am... Blaine Gabbert. 17-43 134 yds. 0td 2int.. Landry Jones. 26-58 248 yds. 0td 5int.. Colt McCoy 20-36 181 yds. 0td's 3int.. Nick Foles. 6-20 28 yds. 0td 1 int.. Enderle 16-31 141 yars 1td 5int Jake Lockear 4-20 71 yds. 1 td 2int.. um.. that's 2 td's and 18 interceptions... Seriously, that's unheard of.. All hail Bo and Carl! (honerable mention hail to Suh and the defensive players that I'm sure had a little to do with that too )

That's a good question I would love to know too. Not that it's important at all as it isn't but I'm curious. Just comments here and there that Tmart was lighting up Bo/Carl's defense in practice would make sense if true. Like everyone else, I'd like to know why Lee is getting almost zero snaps despite our three blowouts so far? If he's in the doghouse, why? There's very little question that Tmart brings boatloads more to the offense but it would seem that his experience would be a great asset as a backup. Or is it because Green is just too much more talented for Lee to get close to and the coaches think they'll just ride with the top two qbs? Maybe getting as much experience as possible for Tmart/Green is the priority? Well, we'll probably never know for sure. The results can't be argued with though. My guess is your last question is the entire reason. Bo is looking ahead to the future and ZLee is a goner at the end of the season. Keep giving the new guys reps... I'm not sure we should be looking too far to the future. We have, by most accounts, a National championship shot this year. My guess is they honestly believe we're a better team with Green at QB than with Lee.. I doubt they'd risk blowing a game this season for the sake of getting him experience.

I'm wondering as well. According to our players, however, Washington was talking a lot of crap before the game. I heard that as well. Even some of their assistant coaches got into it. I read it as a coach saying his team was beaten so badly, the other team couldn't have respected them. Not as Nebraska players were letting him or the team know they didn't respect them.

Yeah, after seeing Martinez on the field, I'm really wondering just how tough of a decision this really was.. I'm guessing they went in letting all 3 qb's know the competition was wide open but Martinez probably left little doubt early on who the QB would be. I doubt he'd give away anything, but it would be nice to see someone ask Bo, now that it's all said and done and his choice was correct, if it really was a "battle to the end" like he said it was.

Very true. I re-watched the game last night and noticed so many bad arm tackles we ran right through. And slow reacting linebackers we ran right by.. As terryfing as our running game may be, Taylor is going to have to beet people through the air at some point. Texas will have the talent at CB to play man to man and commit everyone else to stopping the run.

So terrifying he still has Huskers ranked as 3rd in the Big12... This guy is a homer and should be run out of the Big12 blog. Expecting a big 12 blogger to pick us, support us, applaud u much, whatever is probably unrealistic. In a few months, we're all gone and the rest of the big 12 fans will still be there. He's going to do his best to keep them happy and not care much of what we think. Now the fun will be watching them try desperatley to downplay us to save face for their conference. I don't know about you, but I plan to really enjoy being "disrespected" by the Big 12 talking heads. It will make winning this thing and walking away that much sweeter.