knapplc

From multiple sources on Twitter, and the AP: Also hearing that Pinkel's salary is frozen for a year, 50 hours of community service and no bowl bonus.

According to Jon Nyatawa of the OWS, via Twitter, here are Taylor's targets and the resulting catches thus far this year. Bell: 40 targets (23 catches) Kinnie 36 (19) Enunwa 28 (15) Turner 23 (13) Cotton 22 (13) Burkhead: 19 (15) Reed: 18 (13) Marlowe 16 (9) Cooper 8 (4) Legate 4 (3) Green (2) 1

Able was I, ere I saw......... Ann Arbor?

It's easier to understand in a formula, Where C is Colorado and S is suckage; C:S→X∞ and thus we see that Colorado's suckability is infinite. It's science.

I think we need confirmation that this is or is not the actual factual trophy and not the Penny War thing that GSG brought up HERE.

My grandfather owned a Case and my uncle owned a John Deere. So I'm cool with either.

In the forum, click on the link that says "X replies" where X is the number of replies. Gotta be in the forum, can't do it from inside the topic. A little popup opens and you can see who replied how many times.

this might work - except legit combines only come in green. Definitely not true. Case wins this race This brings up a huge missed opportunity. We could have had a corporate sponsor donate gillions of dollars to this thing and had a bronze John Deere on a pedestal as the trophy. Nobody in Iowa or Nebraska has a problem with a combine.

You have just validated the existence of this thread. Cina wins!!!

Lol I work on the other side of campus. The trophy is no longer there. However! I do have a picture that proves that the location was closer to planet sub, and that there is no BK. But, I dont know how to post pictures on the board. I'm pretty sure that in the absence of a pic, BK still exists in the Union. In fact, I'm going to eat there tonight, just to show you. I'll get a Royale with cheese.

Maybe I got married and didn't tell you guys.... Did you tell the girl?

Win or lose, help us or hurt us, they still suck.

Colorado Buffaloes suck. No exceptions.

Not even getting into the nonsense of the motorcyclist getting paid off, but the bold is incorrect. Driving on a suspended license is a misdemeanor, and is often tossed when a felony is involved. Not preferential treatment, just common lawyer stuff.

Do you feel the Tea Party needs defending on this forum?

An hour later. No pic.

Yes, for good or ill. See my edit in THIS POST

Yes, Carl tends to do that. And this was a very real, constructive post from you. This is the kind of contribution that helps the conversation, although I have to say that this incessant "liberal" drumbeat is misplaced. All we want is a board with conversations. Engage in the conversation, just like you did in the quote above, and you'll be fine.

What are yours? Here's an example. You did the same thing to me earlier.

I thought it would be interesting to see how you responded to the same nonsense you post. To answer your earlier question, I did not say they should not be allowed in the public discourse. I said they would not be relevant. Huge difference there. Everyone has a voice. It's just that some voices aren't worth listening to, and others are.

And you would come to that I have been adding more than others but I am sure Yos and I are not popular on this site!! You are not Yossarian and you are not held accountable for his actions. You are held accountable for yours.

It's a good thing this incessant harping on chat doesn't sound at all like a petulant child whining because they aren't getting their way. I would say it's more along the lines of a disgruntled employee that is passionate about his company maximizing it's potential If you're disgruntled maybe you should try another line of work. EDIT - Landlord, I apologize for my snippy tone. Working on other issues, and I let it seep into my response to you. You didn't deserve that. Again, I apologize.

I'll try to do it if I can sneak away from work for a few minutes. Good man!

I'm rapidly coming to the conclusion that johnnyrodgers20 is trolling. There is no discourse here, just random nonsense spewed forth, with a smiley tacked on at the end for good measure.

So you are saying every adult should know every sexual slang or not be allowed to be in the public discourse? Would you like to try that theory out on yourself? If you miss one you are not allowed to be in the public doscourse ever? You know what I meant. You can play with semantics and be funny!! And if you don't then I am sorry for giving you more credit than you deserve, my Bad!!