Hunter94

i am sorry, there is no good excuse........for the D or the O hunter

well i disagree..........NU football is not dead, BUT i am damn surprised Pud did not come out in suport of Cally.........that is shocking to me! anyone else?? hunter

slausen.....sorry

possibly......Seppo was strating ahead of Clausen for a reason.....

i dunno.......i really don't........if we get beat by both Kansas teams in the same year, i think that would be a record never before broken by them.......anyway if we don't beat KSU we have no chance at CU...i watched them play last week and we are no match for their talent, at any position on the field...sorry just the truth hunter

oh, i am sure if anyone does go, it will come down like that........at least i would hope we would be smart enough to do it that way......IF anyone does depart

wow.........what are you smokin" dude?

they do need to come out fighting mad..and i mean pissed -off mad! hunter

wow, that is not good.......sustaining drives and momentum is a big problem! good stats nameless, they help tell the story, even though we don't like it..... thanks, hunter

thanks, that can only mean we are giving up too many big plays..... hunter

i am betting no one goes....Cally ha a stranggle hold on Pud and he knows it...he also has a line of excuses a mile long.......no one leaves until the end of next season.......sad, but true

the guy that knocked Seppo on his ass probably has a coach who taught him the technique

how well did Glenn run behind that plan? he didn't get sh#t last Saturday..or did you sleep though it?

because running is and always will be an after thought in the WCO...especially with Cally, "cause we take what I want" hunter

yep, i guess all those false starts and penalities are a product of a confusing game plan, that darn old WCO.......

well what else can he say? if we lose out the last 2 games, where will the progress be then? in showing up to play?? hunter

nope, but WHY try to run "the elephant look" when you got slow goddamn elephants? ..that is the goddamn stupidity of this coaching staff.....double standard, yes poor players and poor game plan...duh, "we like the plan cause it sounds good, even though we don't have the players to execute it, we are still gonna do it"........cheez what a worthless philosphy! hunter

Just because you are big doesn't mean you can't have quick feet. That is correct. All the guys i listed run a 5.0 or a 5.1. That's pretty damn good for an offensive lineman. But who cares how fast your 40 time is, it's not like you are running around on the field more. You are mostly blocking. I would take a 6-9, 360 pound guy who runs a 6.1 forty time if he had superior blocking skills. 40 time for an offensive lineman doesn't mean squat and which one of our 300 lb. plus offensive linemen would start for ANY TEAM in the top 25? i will help you with that one........zero, none, nada, zilch.......our big guys can't move........that is my only comment, so don't tell me we need some big guys for the O line, we need some big guys who can move and not like a damn elephant! ask Cody Glenn how far he got against KU behind our elephant line! another philosphy that isn't worth crap! hunter

i guess the last 3 games don't bother you.......but they sure do a lot of other people.......why can't we build on something here? THERE IS SOMETHING WRONG! hunter

not only that but "you play like you practice"........at least that is the philosphy......wonder what the hell practice has looked like lately? have these kids given up due to the coaches? something is wrong here, somewhere hunter

I wasn't arguing that: a) The offensive coaching is the reason why the defense is on the field longer B) The defense is "tired" But I will argue this one: So it's the scheme? The scheme made Bullocks miss at least two key tackles. He's a saftey. He is SUPPOSED TO MAKE OPEN FIELD TACKLES. The scheme made KU block up front very well. The scheme made LB's overpersue time after time. Yea, I'm sure over pursuing a play is all of a sudden being emphasized on a week to week basis. Yea, sorry, not buying that the scheme is the one and only possible source of big plays.

Except they regularly start the game by giving up 3 scores... I won't buy this 'tired' crap. I don't understand. Hunter is saying that by pure numbers, an offense that is on the field more is simply going to score more points. You don't agree? Fine, whatever. But if our D could force 3 and out situations then wouldn't the offences be on the field for the same amount of time? It's not like the other team's offence is lining up on the ball when it is supposed to be NU's possession or anything. Okay, even if I grant you that they ARE tired in the first half when they give up 17 - 21 points, they're only tired because the defense can't stop ANY offense at all. 3rd and Long? We might as well just let them step off the 10 yards or whatever they need for a first becasue at least that would save a touchdown. There is no reason that the other team has the ball longer or is on the field more other than that the scheming is poor enough to allow the opposing team to get long drives and huge plays. You're arguing that the symptom is the cause. Hey bud, don't put words in my mouth. I was simply pointing out that the longer a defense is on the field, the more time and the more opportunities the other team has to score. Period. I don't care who is coaching, who's in the stands or who's armchair quarterbacking it. exactly Dave, that was my point from the start........and yes besides that the D falls on their face on the first series..yes, that too! so what are the excuses for starting poorly? bad defensive schemes?? hunter

so nameless, you claim to be close to the team.....stick your nose in and tell us what is really going on inside....... hunter

but last year we held MU to 3 points? that scheme obviously worked then......