trick plays against CU??

[rawhide]

sCrUmptious,

 

I'm sure you would have. Luckily we didn't or might have lost for sure. Not made it a squeeker.

 

GBR

[SkullandBones]

i think it was ridiculous to run the same field goal fake...cu had seen it on tape and what were they to lose by sending someone right to the path of the toss to henery...we would've been better off kicking it, especially since it was shorter than henery's ~57 yarder

 

Henery is a hero . . . but didn't he kinda run out of the way of the CU player on the fake FG? If he would have run into him he wouldn't catch the ball or at least score the TD, the D holds and at the point of Ganz's sack we would be leading 30 - 24?

 

He made a 57 yard field goal to win the game!! Sheesh.

 

Also, on the fake, I think the announcers may have been right, it should have been down and CU ball at the spot of the kick. As soon as Henery made a 'non kicking' move the ball is considered live. Henery made such a move at the snap, the ball was caught and placed on the ground by the holder, who's knee was on the ground, thus downing it right there. But, I could be wrong.

[VA Husker Fan]

 

Also, on the fake, I think the announcers may have been right, it should have been down and CU ball at the spot of the kick. As soon as Henery made a 'non kicking' move the ball is considered live. Henery made such a move at the snap, the ball was caught and placed on the ground by the holder, who's knee was on the ground, thus downing it right there. But, I could be wrong.

 

Well, they sure didn't call it down on the same looking fake earlier in the year that worked, nor on the other team (I forget who) that also ran it this year, so it's pretty clear the announcers weren't up to date on how the refs call it.

 

Didn't they come back later and say that the NCAA decided this year to allow this play, like the SEC had before this year?