I think we should play...

[master]

All of these teams have the lead on us by the amount listed.

Texas 4

Oklahoma 7

Alabama 1

Arizona 1

Arkansas 1

Clemson 1 (play in 2009)

Stanford 1

Duke 1

Georgia tech 1

Houston 1

Michigan 1

Mississippi 1

Penn state 1

Purdue 1

USC 2

Ohio state 2

Syracuse 2

Indiana 2

Washington state 2

Florida state 4

Minnesota 9

Pittsburg 9

 

Obviously we play two of these teams each year and we are already going to play clemson, but I think the huskers should play the rest of these teams multiple times so that there will be no teams with a winning record over us. I want to start by playing Duke and Houston since its embarrassing to say they have a winning record over us.

[tattooedhusker]

what?

[Huskers Forever]

What in the hell are you talking about?

[Vince from ShamWOW]

What in the hell are you talking about?

 

ditto that

is he trying to say?

[tattooedhusker]

maybe he's talking about they lead the overall series between them and NU?

[Vince from ShamWOW]

maybe he's talking about they lead the overall series between them and NU?

 

 

and maybe he's saying @^hgsw(*nd)ddW000---3RNVCNSDFKCFWDFHFIFDVJDFGVMSL[PLCEF=[;.Q

[tattooedhusker]

touche' my friend....are you sure he's not saying gOu0SGJ"jkl'SDG'jkl???

[Vince from ShamWOW]

touche' my friend....are you sure he's not saying gOu0SGJ"jkl'SDG'jkl???

 

He might be. My gOu0SGI"jkl'SDG'jkl??? isn't what it used to be.

[tattooedhusker]

I think your right...I'll have to check the records.

[husker B-rent]

i thought it was quite clear that he was talking about head to head record. they have won that many more than us in the series....

[redout22]

i thought it was quite clear that he was talking about head to head record. they have won that many more than us in the series....

We need to play the teams that we are just losing by one in the series

[Vince from ShamWOW]

i thought it was quite clear that he was talking about head to head record. they have won that many more than us in the series....

We need to play the teams that we are just losing by one in the series

 

As opposed to playing those teams where we lose by 28 or more points?

[clone]

you all know what he means.

 

be careful, you could catch hell for being too "nitpicky"

 

[SouthBayHusker]

All of these teams have the lead on us by the amount listed.

Texas 4

Oklahoma 7

Alabama 1

Arizona 1

Arkansas 1

Clemson 1 (play in 2009)

Stanford 1

Duke 1

Georgia tech 1

Houston 1

Michigan 1

Mississippi 1

Penn state 1

Purdue 1

USC 2

Ohio state 2

Syracuse 2

Indiana 2

Washington state 2

Florida state 4

Minnesota 9

Pittsburg 9

 

Obviously we play two of these teams each year and we are already going to play clemson, but I think the huskers should play the rest of these teams multiple times so that there will be no teams with a winning record over us. I want to start by playing Duke and Houston since its embarrassing to say they have a winning record over us.

I guess you don't know a F**KING thing about scheduling, but if you come up with the $1,000,000 guarentee to get them and the $300,000 BUYOUT to get them out of their non-conference games that are already scheduled .... by all means HANDLE IT!!!!!!!!

[IveAbigN]

first, in order to determine the thought pattern of the myopic mind, and exact some focal clearity, one has to consider the heat of the meat, and the angle of the dangle, considering the mass of the ass is constant.... and... ughh.., what was he saying???