mmmtodd Posted January 18, 2010 Share Posted January 18, 2010 I keep seeing this NY Times article mentioned in places, but cant seem to find it. Anyone have any info to add to this? What Ive seen and heard multiple times is that the NCAA is considering a 2 year postseason play ban, and a complete television ban, of the USC football program. This would obviously be huge, but I cant seem to think media whore Lane Kiffin would go there if this was possible. BTW- i ran across this picture while trying to tack down info on this story... Quote Link to comment
HSKRNOKC Posted January 18, 2010 Share Posted January 18, 2010 Poetic justice in many ways if it is real. Quote Link to comment
sarge87 Posted January 18, 2010 Share Posted January 18, 2010 Not happening. No way, no how, nothing, nada, zip. Does anybody really think the NCAA would ever bite the hand that feeds them when they get a cut out of the TV money generated? USC alumni stretch to all 50 states, so taking them off TV would create a ratings disaster for the network that has the deal with the Pac 10 Conference. I can see a reduction in scholarships and possibly a reduction of in-house recruiting days, but that is about as far as they will go. Quote Link to comment
rawhide Posted January 18, 2010 Share Posted January 18, 2010 I thought it was sanctions against the basketball team??? GBR Quote Link to comment
HuskerfaninOkieland Posted January 18, 2010 Share Posted January 18, 2010 I thought it was sanctions against the basketball team??? GBR Those were self-imposed by the university itself. What the NCAA is possibly looking at, is imposing some other sanctions on the athletic department itself much like what OU went thru a few years ago with Bomar and his "job", the basketball teams recruiting violations, the gymnastics teams problems, etc. I don't see USC getting hit that hard. At most, a few years probation, maybe a post-season ban for a couple of years, loss of a couple of scholarships for a few years, etc. Where it could really hit them though is if the NCAA forces them to vacate some wins when Bush was there. Could mean they lose their MNC trophy. Quote Link to comment
fro daddy Posted January 18, 2010 Share Posted January 18, 2010 wow! That would be a huge penalty. A complete B****** for 2 years would show they really had some issues there. Quote Link to comment
fro daddy Posted January 18, 2010 Share Posted January 18, 2010 I dont know why Black out is a bad word...... Quote Link to comment
Vuren Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 I dont know why Black out is a bad word...... mods got tired of people begging for a b1ackout at football games or b1ack jerseys. so you know that's what they did. Quote Link to comment
carlfense Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Not happening. No way, no how, nothing, nada, zip. Does anybody really think the NCAA would ever bite the hand that feeds them when they get a cut out of the TV money generated? USC alumni stretch to all 50 states, so taking them off TV would create a ratings disaster for the network that has the deal with the Pac 10 Conference. I can see a reduction in scholarships and possibly a reduction of in-house recruiting days, but that is about as far as they will go. I don't know . . . I think the NCAA will hammer whoever blatantly breaks the rules. They took all those wins from FSU (and their coach) just for textbooks. If players were paid and USC knew it . . . they will get hammered. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.