husker_fan_from_sweden Posted September 5, 2015 Share Posted September 5, 2015 Couldn't help but notice Mark Banker looking confused on the sideline. With BYU on pace for 600 yards, is it still too late for the Mike Riley era to switch to a 3-4 like 80% of the successful NFL teams have?BYU's 3-4 looks a heck of a lot more formidable. Quote Link to comment
lo country Posted September 5, 2015 Share Posted September 5, 2015 We got little pressure. Almost none..... We rushed 4 they blocked with 5-6...... Their back up looked like a Hypesman hopeful.... Quote Link to comment
EmeraldIngot Posted September 5, 2015 Share Posted September 5, 2015 We don't have the Linebackers for a 3-4, but without a true rush end, we have the d-line for it. I personally favor a 3-4 front seven and a cover 4/quarters secondary. In a pinch, you can drop 8 into coverage, 4 over top and 4 underneath. You can put 9 in the box by either blitzing the corners or dropping the safeties into the box. Its versatile, has the potential for literally everything you can think of defensively. It can hold the running game to short yards, it can smother the passing game, and if you coach it right, you can adjust it on the field to stop any formation without substitutions, even a 5 WR look. Its weakness is a well coached power run team unless you're run blitzing your LBs and dropping your safeties in the box, but that leaves you vulnerable to screens and play action. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.