StPaulHusker

The legal definition of nonconsensual pornography Under Penal Code 647(j)(4) PC, the legal definition of revenge porn/nonconsensual pornography is as follows: You have an image of the intimate body part of another identifiable person, or an image of that person engaged in sexual intercourse, sodomy, oral copulation or masturbation; You intentionally distribute that image; There was an understanding between you and that person that the image would remain private; You know or should know that the distribution of the image will cause the person serious emotional distress; and The person depicted suffers serious emotional distress.5

I was unaware that it was illegal to have sex with Redux's sister. Bullet dodged.

Do you hate your sister that much?

Yeah. That's not going to justify revenge porn.

Let's put all legal issues aside. At the very minimum, if I were the coach, half a season suspension. If the roles were reversed, id the female an athlete at a university? If yes, the same as the football player. If no, then I'm not sure. The fact is the players have a code and rules they must abide by.

Yeah. I didn't type that right. I think there is enough at this point to lay judgement that he did it to hurt her.

No. I don't believe he did. There is no way he could have at that time. I probably didn't type that correctly. I do believe he sent that video to her as a way to shame her for wronging him or perceived cheating or something like that.

They said that it was an incident involving an inappropriate cell phone video. They, rightfully so, deny that Maurice sent the video to re-victimize the girl as it pertains to possible sexual assault charges. Because there is no doubt in my mind that Maurice knew or thought it was a sexual assault. They aren't denying that he sent her the video with the "Remember this hoe" phrase.

Amazing isn't it? If a community takes accountability of their town, good things can happen.

I can't help you believe things. And I'm not sure what your second comment has to do with anything regarding Nebraska.

I'm not talking about the alleged assault. I'm talking about the video that was sent from Washington to the girl. That is not in dispute at this point. Even Washington's lawyers don't dispute it was sent.

I didn't like Mike Riley and I do like Scott Frost. What I don't like is people thinking he is a deity and can do no wrong.

I'll take it that you are referring to my post. In which case I am talking about ANY female being victimized. Not just the one in question. And if you want to discuss what the girl involved in the MW situation is a victim of, it's revenge porn. MW kept and sent video of a 15 year old girl in order to harm her.

I literally have zero notion that a coach can do that 100% of the time. But go back and look at people on here that do. Claiming he's "doing it the right way, etc" I think that is where you will find your proverbial high horse.

If you think victimizing females is just an arbitrary line not to be crossed that says more about you than me.

Sounds like something I would say. And that is the point I'm trying to make. People on here that want to champion Frost as someone that is only going to recruit guys with high character need to stop thinking that way. Because he's going to do what is necessary to win. But compromising his morals would be more broad than just the character of players. I will say one thing though--I don't have any tolerance for players that do things towards girls or women.

Could be all of them. Could be none of them. But if that is the hill you want to die on, then maybe we can dispense with notion Frost is only recruiting players of high character.

Yes

He saved and sent the video with the intent to harm her. Do you need a conviction to make the determination?

Has this been covered? Came out about 20 minutes ago https://chicago.suntimes.com/sports/nebraska-maurice-washington-charged-assault-video/ "Hamilton said she decided to file charges Dec. 17 and is now waiting for a judge to sign a warrant for Washington’s arrest. She said it typically takes two or three months for a warrant to be signed after charges of this type are filed. Once a warrant is signed, Washington would face extradition from Nebraska or he could return to California on his own and surrender to authorities."

Is, in your opinion, Maurice Washington a person/player of high character?

https://www.shouselaw.com/statutory_rape.html

I'm not taking a wait and see approach to the funding. I think it's great what they managed. I'm saying it's pointless for Democrats to claim any sort of victory if Trump is a bonehead again. My judgement of Washington is based solely on his shaming the girl with the video. He doesn't have to be charged or found guilty in a court of law for me to have that opinion.