BigRedBuster

This really is the only thing that pertains to my comment (I'm glad I'm not single) which, isn't a condemnation of my comment. I honestly don't know where the rules are now (after close to 30 years of marriage) and where they are going. My comment is perfectly normal and it doesn't make me any less sensitive to the situation. Well....pardon me if I find someone's lively hood and way of making a living in this world a little sacred and shouldn't just be brushed aside. And...that comment from me has nothing to do with me not taking women's complaints seriously about sexual assault.

Oh BS...that's now what anyone is saying. Clearly.

No, I'm perfectly glad I'm not single and I'm OK saying it. To the bold.....So....you are saying Aziz did something he shouldn't have done but it might not be a crime.......but........you're OK if his career gets ruined because of it. But, that's potentially what is happen here.....even though a crime probably wasn't committed...or at least at this point, no evidence of it being committed has been released.

Is it OK? I would probably error on the side of saying it's not OK also without knowing more or even being there. Obviously we are hearing one side. Anytime you talk about relationships and sexuality and people trying to start relationships, things can get rather emotional on either side and misinterpreted. I would really hope my son wouldn't act like this on a first date especially after the woman clearly said no. However, I fail to see how anything happened here (that we know of from the article) that would go to the extent of it should be used to try to ruin a guy's career.

Hey...if she says no and puts her clothes back on....then the answer is no. I agree with that. But...I still don't find anything in this that is sexual assault. And....just because a woman goes home crying, doesn't mean it's sexual assault either.

Let's not get into claiming these are anywhere close to an equivalent situation. Tanner came to college believing he didn't want to play sports anymore. He decided to go to a tryout and actually was accepted on the team as a walk on. After his first season of not getting any playing time, he decided he didn't want to play anymore and left. Again, he changed his mind and came back. This didn't create any in season drama or affect the starting lineup of the team. Now....Jordy on the other hand, comes in as a scholarship player, starts all 18 games and then decides he doesn't like it and leaves in the middle of the season, leaving his team without starter when trying to make it to the tournament. HUGE difference here. If Jordy had done this in April, nobody would be talking about it much.

I am so glad I'm not single. Reading the article, something struck me. She gives this big account of him doing things sexually that she didn't like. She said no and they didn't have sex. Now....what struck me was when she said, "they agreed to put their clothes back on". I don't remember anything in her account that said he took her clothes off without her consent. She was very specific to point on other things she wasn't wanting....but left out that he took her clothes off without her consent. So....I have to assume that they undressed each other and that was fully consensual. Now, they're laying there naked.....and she's shocked that he wants to feel her vagina?....and that he wants her to feel his penis???? What am I missing? Now....obviously at some point, he turned her off what what he was doing and ultimately she left without having sex with him. With what that article said....I'm having a hard time thinking this is sexual assault. There would have to be more to it.

I got nothing to answer your question with.

So....The President uses a term and when other people use the term it's outrageous? Hey....maybe it was a mistake for the President to use the term then????

So, this is a message from the heavens. Wow......

What the heck does "SKOL Vikings" mean?

I'm simply asking a question clarifying that you do believe it's disgusting for a Dad to think about sex when he thinks about his own daughter. I didn't say you think about sex with YOUR daughter in this post. Hey, we have a President who obviously thinks about sex when he sees his daughter. So....I guess I think it's a valid thing to clarify. If people are uncomfortable with these discussions, maybe....just maybe.....we shouldn't vote a President in that thinks about Sex when he thinks about his daughter.

So, you do think it's disgusting when a Dad thinks about sex when he thinks about his own daughter? I'm glad...

That's some amazing gymnastics there with that thought process. You must not have actually listened to the entire video clip.

The guy can't keep his hands off of hot women even if he's married or their married. You know.....because he just grabs their pussies and tries f'ing them anyway. He has cheated on every wife he has ever had. He thinks his daughter is a great piece of ass and thinks the one thing they have in common is sex. That "R" beside his name is really really really strong isn't it? It even makes people support child molesters.

It's no wonder Trump has no problem supporting child molesters for Senate.

I will guarantee you one thing. I have two daughters and I have never ever ever even thought about them as a great piece of ass or that I would like to date them or that we have "sex" as something in common. Now....that may be how you think about your daughters......if so, you got issues. It is fact that the guy thinks about sex when he thinks about his daughter. You don't make these comments without that being the case. Anyone, defending these or thinking they show anything else is blinded by the "R" beside his name.

Yeah....talking about how his 16 year old daughter has a great body and how hot she is......Gee, Donny, what do you have in common with your daughter??? "sex".....interesting. A father that is constantly thinking about sex when he thinks about his daughter is one disgusting human being. And...that's not hyperbolic. I guess maybe sex with underage relatives is OK with Republicans now.

Well.....that's easy. And....oh since this was the very next youtube video that came up, I'll throw it in for good measure. Disgusting jackass pretty much sums it up.

You really need me to prove he thinks his daughter is a great piece of ass, brags about sexual assault and thinks Nazis are "fine people"????

Bull s#!t. He specifically said she would call her a great piece of ass and would love to have sex with her. There is absolutely NOTHING I said in that post that was hyperbole. Now...this is just an example of how his stupid idiot comments get in the way of taking him serious about anything. People want immigration reform. His comments about "s#!thole" countries have done absolutely nothing to move that forward. Instead, it has completely derailed any discussions. It's a prime example of how his incompetence in this doesn't help the issues. Anything that gets done is in spite of the idiot in the oval office. The guy is such an incompetent ass, he thinks his tough talk helps with issues. But, in fact, it's just the opposite of moving anything forward to a meaningful end.

You know what? I don't support the Dems. But, someone who wants to f#*k his own daughter, brags about sexual assault and thinks Nazis are "fine people".......doesn't do squat to move anything forward in a positive manner.

Yeah...kind of like using a social media like Twitter to constantly make crap up, insult people, be a disgusting idiot, lie to the American people, disrespect law enforcement, disrespect the judicial system of the US, supporting the Nazi moment and KKK, showing total incompetence of the constitution.... Yeah......someone's doing things to derail people working together.

They might be willing to work with Trump if he weren't such and embarrassing incompetent blubbering disgusting jackass.

That’s not the point of the tweet. It’s been said that Eichorst banned them from recruiting JUCOs. That’s clearly not the case.