SouthLincoln Husker

This is Tim's 4th year, so why are the smallest team? Basketball is the easiest sport to turn a program around. Really! Tell me how? You want me to tell you how to turn a program around, is that what you are really asking me? I am done here! You are too much over the top!

This is Tim's 4th year, so why are the smallest team? Basketball is the easiest sport to turn a program around. Really! Tell me how?

Wow, we are one of the youngest teams in the league with no size. Yes, it was an ugly loss. But some of these posts are unbelievable.

He only coached their for 5 years and took a horrible team to a contender in their division. My only complaint is Molinari & Miles staying with Benny who was a 1 year wonder.

Ever since we brought in Molinari to coach defense, we got worse!

When you are struggling to find offense, its too hard to find a rhythm when playing 10 guys.

Same as last year, when Benny is in the game guard 4 & play a rover. Cunningham made Parker look like a HS player

Our def. sucks. How does our PG keep getting switched to guard the center? Makes no sense.

Noone is playing def.

Ugly game! We start so slow, we need to change something up like starting Watson!

I'm confused. What is 5.4-5.0 and 4.9 Along with a star rating, each player is assigned a numerical value that translates to what their stars are. Check Rivals and the number is directly below their stars. Ok. I'm just used to the way 247 grades them. Thanks. 247 is a composite and that is were i quoted the criteria of a 2 star.

Nice, Samford has a higher RPI then we do!

I hope so. Hard to tell with juco film. Level of athletes at the juco make it hard. Some studs out there and then some scrubs. He shows very good athleticism for an LB and plays well in space. Quick to close on the ball. Film reminded me a bit of Zaire. But who the heck knows if this guy will be a player. I would ignore the 2 star rating though. They don't scout juco guys very well. I would trust a coach evaluation over rivals or scout on juco guys. 2 Star means that he has not been evaluated. Not true. He is a 5.4 rated 2 star which means they see him as a role player in college. A no star means no eval A Two-star prospect is a player that has the ability, but there is not enough known about the prospect to rank them accurately.

I hope so. Hard to tell with juco film. Level of athletes at the juco make it hard. Some studs out there and then some scrubs. He shows very good athleticism for an LB and plays well in space. Quick to close on the ball. Film reminded me a bit of Zaire. But who the heck knows if this guy will be a player. I would ignore the 2 star rating though. They don't scout juco guys very well. I would trust a coach evaluation over rivals or scout on juco guys. 2 Star means that he has not been evaluated.

And we had one of the best RBs in the country, who carried NE on his back!

The Boleavers were out in force on the radio today. They basically said that Epley was a puppet of the University and he was backing Riley. I love idiots talking smack in public with no basis.

Come on Jr. commit and lead this class to a top 10 class.

Ok....I have three CPAs in my family, with one being my wife, all from different schools. Accounting is one of those programs that once they reach a certain level of instruction, there is not going to be a huge difference. I would love to know what criteria they used for claiming that. Now, if you would have said "management", or "law".....etc. I'd buy the idea that one is so much better. That's a wrong assumption, unless you want to be a clerk or work for government all your life. If you want more, where you go to school makes a difference. What???? Brother....university of Nebraska....CPA.....position at one of the big firms out of school worked his way up through auditing till he moved to a large local firm and was almost partner till he quit and started his own business going very well. Brother in law....CPA...masters in tax accounting from CSU.....started in tax accounting then was pretty high up in internal auditing of an international company. Now he is CFO of a pretty large manufacturing company. Wife.....CPA.....from UNK...started in tax accounting but worked up quickly to assistant controller then CFO of large home builder in Des Moines. Now CFO of one of the largest construction companies in Nebraska. FAR from just clerk or government jobs. You just said to any school as an accountant and succeed. There is much more to it, but I am not going to argue with you on a football forum.

Ok....I have three CPAs in my family, with one being my wife, all from different schools. Accounting is one of those programs that once they reach a certain level of instruction, there is not going to be a huge difference. I would love to know what criteria they used for claiming that. Now, if you would have said "management", or "law".....etc. I'd buy the idea that one is so much better. That's a wrong assumption, unless you want to be a clerk or work for government all your life. If you want more, where you go to school makes a difference.

What level do you coach at.... Probably the same as you. Seeing as this is a message board, 95 percent of the posters are not involved in coaching and are just fans who want to see this team do well. If I was bashing a coach who had success this year or in general, I could see your comment having some merit. But since you are probably some division one coach, lets hear your actual insight. And next time use a question mark, those periods make you look like a junior high girl texting her bff.Nope just a fan. You are bashing a coach that had success. Typically when you see a good run defense you think line and when you see a good pass defense you think DB's - now we know it takes both, however I would say that our run defense was pretty good this year compared to the guy that new how to defend against the run last year. It's not perfect however headed in the correct direction.Headed in the right direction? After one year which had its ups and downs, it is tough to determine the direction of the defense and the d-line. How many sacks did the defensive line have? How much pressure did they get on the QB? Did defenses pass more than they ran against us due to our deficiencies in that area? It is too early to know, and people can easily use the "these are pelini's recruits" argument, but I am more concerned with recruiting, not on-field production. It's tough to stop the run when you don't have any big bodies. It's about the Jimmies and the Joes. You can have the best system in place but if you don't have the players what are you supposed to do? The DE and OT position groups are laughable how is that Rileys fault? It's all about how you look at things. Pelini's pass defense was much better with similar players. It comes down to perspective and we all have our opinions to go either way with it. Bo used the safeties in pass def. & Banker uses them in run defense. Thus, this we are better in rush defense and worse in pass defense. That's the popular version of the story but it's not true. That is how we started the year. Banker switched it up starting with the Michigan St.

What level do you coach at.... Probably the same as you. Seeing as this is a message board, 95 percent of the posters are not involved in coaching and are just fans who want to see this team do well. If I was bashing a coach who had success this year or in general, I could see your comment having some merit. But since you are probably some division one coach, lets hear your actual insight. And next time use a question mark, those periods make you look like a junior high girl texting her bff.Nope just a fan. You are bashing a coach that had success. Typically when you see a good run defense you think line and when you see a good pass defense you think DB's - now we know it takes both, however I would say that our run defense was pretty good this year compared to the guy that new how to defend against the run last year. It's not perfect however headed in the correct direction.Headed in the right direction? After one year which had its ups and downs, it is tough to determine the direction of the defense and the d-line. How many sacks did the defensive line have? How much pressure did they get on the QB? Did defenses pass more than they ran against us due to our deficiencies in that area? It is too early to know, and people can easily use the "these are pelini's recruits" argument, but I am more concerned with recruiting, not on-field production. It's tough to stop the run when you don't have any big bodies. It's about the Jimmies and the Joes. You can have the best system in place but if you don't have the players what are you supposed to do? The DE and OT position groups are laughable how is that Rileys fault? It's all about how you look at things. Pelini's pass defense was much better with similar players. It comes down to perspective and we all have our opinions to go either way with it. Bo used the safeties in pass def. & Banker uses them in run defense. Thus, this we are better in rush defense and worse in pass defense.

Your source!

Really!

Jacobson was picked up due potential. Staff is hoping he would grow to be 6'10" or taller. He seems to play the post better than Morrow, who seems a little overwhelmed. I think Morrow would be better playing behind Shields.

Nice win, but Watson needs to start and Benny needs to bring the energy off the bench!