Jump to content


Lunchbucket

Members
  • Posts

    168
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Lunchbucket

  1. Pull it and run that option you habe set up with Palmer. They are keying on Grant
  2. I don't give a sh%t who's better in practice. He sucks in the game
  3. 1st quarter and they are going to lean on us to wear us out early. Then it gets ugly
  4. Who cares. Focus on GO, not show. Maybe let's get a coach and staff to get some wins, and build. Anything else is a distraction and needs zero focus
  5. Palmer has to slow down for it and no one is even close to him still. Good lord
  6. I read the post. Getting the troops to rally after all the s#!t that has happened is a miracle. Ain't gonna happen. He can get some but can't get all and can't sustain it overnight. Looked like they got a good start then fell off and OU was better. I'm impartial to MJ. If he is successful great but I'm not holding my breath. I'm more for a huge hire proven to do it. But MJ is who we have till the end of the season so we roll with him
  7. So MJ has 6 days he takes a team that shot themselves in almost every game but he's supposed turn it around and he amazing with a top 6 team. Riiiiiiggghhht FFS
  8. Receiver should have sat in that zone. He leads him that backer has a shot at a pick. On the Receiver
  9. 100% see how they respond. They looked chippy and fired up before so let's get pissed and respond
  10. How is there only one guy back there to make a tackle and he whiffs
  11. Actually never thought about him like that but I completely agree
  12. Grant is a BEAST! Been a while since we had a guy like him
  13. You said: The defense had clearly shown they weren't very good by that point in the game Which IMO shows they will score wether FG or TD. Maybe SF thought they would stop and then we could March it down the field. Missed tackles all over, no pressure on QB, lack of running, missing wide open receivers, receivers dropping passes, blown coverage, NW lots of YAC, might be more things to look at than 2 timeouts used to try to score again
  14. You mean like we used to do. Nothing fancy, you know what is coming, stop it
  15. So you give up trying to get the ball back with some time if they score or go out on downs? We got into FG range, and barely missed. They make that FG no one would question the time outs. Or NW score anyway and now we have no time people would be pissed. Two ways to look at it but those time outs didn't cost us the game
×
×
  • Create New...