Archy1221

Thanks man. Really appreciate it! It’s my opinion that Easter, being the holiest day on the Christian calendar, deserves to be revered as such. Transgender Day could have been celebrated/acknowledged/proclaimed, for a day earlier or a day later this year out of respect. It’s my opinion that having these Transgender Days and celebrating Transgenderism is a disservice a great deal of confused young adults who get wrapped up into the false ideology by members who really don’t have the best interest of the said individuals well being. They just want to advance what I think can be described as a cult that preys upon confused/mentally unstable young adults looking for where they fit in in life. They are looking for acceptance somewhere and people wanting to promote the transgender ideology are more than happy to rope them in. It’s my personal opinion that transgenderism is a mental illness that shouldn’t be celebrated and instead those people should get the therapy they need and deserve. I’m speaking from someone who is extremely close to an affected person whose life was almost completely destroyed getting pulled into that life. It’s fact that there are a minuscule amount of cases where a person was born with both sex organs and parents chose one that didn’t quite match up to what the child’s puberty and mental state as an adult made them out to be. That is quite different than so so so many kids who are confused in life and get pushed into thinking it’s a gender issue and they were just born with the wrong sex organs, etc….. it’s my personal opinion that parents do a disservice to kids confused about life and push them into thinking they are just the wrong gender. Bulls#!t. It’s my personal opinion that Dr.‘s are doing kids a disservice by allowing kids and actually sometimes promoting kids to think they need to change genders. Bulls#!t It’s my opinion that a kid under the age of 8 who barely even knows much difference between boys and girls has the capacity to decide they were born the wrong gender and that kinda s#!t is celebrated. Bulls#!t. It’s my personal opinion that drug companies should get out of the business of puberty blockers for kids wanting to “transition” to a different gender. Bulls#!t. it’s my personal opinion that none of that should be celebrated on the holiest day of the Christian calendar. It’s my personal opinion that transgenderism is a gender dysphoria mental issue being pushed as something else for who knows what reason. So there ya go. I would prefer other young teens/recently turned adults not have to go through what someone very close to me went through, and what she says others she knows have gone through. All my personal opinion of course because a question was asked and no disrespect intended for any board member.

I read that and the dude was definitely spitting fire. A couple thoughts came to mind.. 1) anyone who thinks Kyle took the right path after being acquitted isn’t thinking properly IMO 2) After reading this article, it seems like the guy was making a big deal about doing what he was hired and paid to do. Things that are pretty common in a defense situation (when money is available anyways). I’m sure he was paid accordingly. 3) he never does say if he thinks Kyle was correctly judged on the case he participated in. 4) no one should claim Kyle is a hero, nor hold him up as one. Even though he wasn’t the bad guy in the situation. 5) gotta repeat that Kyle has taking the incorrect path forward after correctly being found not guilty.

Thank you. I will check them out in the near future.

Yep.

Well, always literally means at all times on all occasions. So that’s how I would define it. In terms of what you are saying about Heritage Foundation, hard to comment without a link to what you are saying.

True. Though many are getting hammered in this interest rate environment. Matters none to me as they willingly took out debt and should be responsible for it. I still say that fine in the Trump case is bulls#!t if the info listed is correct on how they came up with the fine. The bank willingly took the loan and agreed to terms after doing their own due diligence and was paid back.

To be fair, every real estate developer I’ve ever personally known or heard of uses debt to finance projects.

Your words say “worse than we already imagined”. How do you imagine it to be currently” Your implication with the previous statements suggest you’ve already imagined it and your imagination doesn’t have a good view of you think I’m going to say. In the interest of transparency, unlike what you are providing after being asked, I’ll give it a go.

I knew you would help make my point

Tell me how you imagine my answer then I will.

Yes. It’s a story of yours from decades ago that may or may not be true. I believe you but others may not. Back to the question though. You mentioned your pals have changed thought processes as they got older and quit the young casual sex scene. Did the abortions take place within the timefram that they currently support? Maybe their views haven’t changed on abortion, but other views have become more conservative and you just don’t like which politicians they support.

Nope, but excellent try and twisting things around. It is on you, for doing that. How do already imagine my answer?

Once again we agree!

Ahhh. Ok, I fixed the reply for you. So ya, based on the extended clip, he would not be talking about his wife or in-laws.

Welp, there ya go @Guy Chamberlin. You got what you were looking for. Conflating what said with words I didn’t say in the hopes other posters wouldn’t understand. Job well done.

Who was he calling animals. The clip was edited to where we don’t hear.

I’m fine explaining in public, but certain posters here will take words out of context in order to twist them into something it’s not in hopes a mod finds that innocent discussion possibly skirts board rules. we both know this hat to be the case so why are you playing coy here?

Gotcha. Makes sense

Not to get too deep in the weeds here but in the past you judged people to be a$$h@!es, dumb asses, dips#!ts, criminals when not convicted of a crime, etc…(and rightfully so at times I might add like in the Iowa post just a few minutes ago) which wasn’t judging opinions but making judgement on their person. And that’s totally fine because we all do it.

You judge people all the time on here, just like the rest of us

That would a question for your friends and it would depend on when the alleged abortions they paid for took place. As it sound from your post, that they accept some timeframe for abortion currently. I’m not sure we have the scientific knowledge to turn someone into someone else. I guess it may depend on our definition of “turn into” in that context means.

Could sound like they are judging others exactly as they judged themselves back in the day. That abortion is acceptable up to a certain point. Though it’s hard to tell as we didn’t get an answer from you as to when these abortions took place. Within a month or two of finding out about the pregnancy, second term, third term…. As far as SCOTUS goes, we don’t know what “leniency” towards abortion it would accept from a legal standpoint. The case SCOTUS resolved didn’t attempt to answer that question.

I won’t be trying to answer it either in this forum because of the risk of others taking words out of context, trying to get me banned which often has happened. Maybe though a private DM we could discuss, but otherwise I will pass. They are welcome I guess That would be your opinion. I literally stated it could get visibility on the days they currently get visibility. I did not know that. Maybe that’s why I’ve preferred the Teclu burner.

Which pro life politics are they supporting? No access to abortion? Limited access to abortion after a certain timeframe? If so what is the timeframe these peers are supporting? In general, what was the timeframe of when these procedures took place in relation to conception? Does it coincide with their current timeframe policies these peers support? Or have thought processes changed? Is the child happy he/she was born?