Archy1221

Nope, but excellent try and twisting things around. It is on you, for doing that. How do already imagine my answer?

Once again we agree!

Ahhh. Ok, I fixed the reply for you. So ya, based on the extended clip, he would not be talking about his wife or in-laws.

Welp, there ya go @Guy Chamberlin. You got what you were looking for. Conflating what said with words I didn’t say in the hopes other posters wouldn’t understand. Job well done.

Who was he calling animals. The clip was edited to where we don’t hear.

I’m fine explaining in public, but certain posters here will take words out of context in order to twist them into something it’s not in hopes a mod finds that innocent discussion possibly skirts board rules. we both know this hat to be the case so why are you playing coy here?

Gotcha. Makes sense

Not to get too deep in the weeds here but in the past you judged people to be a$$h@!es, dumb asses, dips#!ts, criminals when not convicted of a crime, etc…(and rightfully so at times I might add like in the Iowa post just a few minutes ago) which wasn’t judging opinions but making judgement on their person. And that’s totally fine because we all do it.

You judge people all the time on here, just like the rest of us

That would a question for your friends and it would depend on when the alleged abortions they paid for took place. As it sound from your post, that they accept some timeframe for abortion currently. I’m not sure we have the scientific knowledge to turn someone into someone else. I guess it may depend on our definition of “turn into” in that context means.

Could sound like they are judging others exactly as they judged themselves back in the day. That abortion is acceptable up to a certain point. Though it’s hard to tell as we didn’t get an answer from you as to when these abortions took place. Within a month or two of finding out about the pregnancy, second term, third term…. As far as SCOTUS goes, we don’t know what “leniency” towards abortion it would accept from a legal standpoint. The case SCOTUS resolved didn’t attempt to answer that question.

I won’t be trying to answer it either in this forum because of the risk of others taking words out of context, trying to get me banned which often has happened. Maybe though a private DM we could discuss, but otherwise I will pass. They are welcome I guess That would be your opinion. I literally stated it could get visibility on the days they currently get visibility. I did not know that. Maybe that’s why I’ve preferred the Teclu burner.

Which pro life politics are they supporting? No access to abortion? Limited access to abortion after a certain timeframe? If so what is the timeframe these peers are supporting? In general, what was the timeframe of when these procedures took place in relation to conception? Does it coincide with their current timeframe policies these peers support? Or have thought processes changed? Is the child happy he/she was born?

………As President I said so. We can give you even more Visibility on one the other upcoming 35 LGBTQIA days if you feel slighted” No reason to try and get bonus points because I already aced the quiz and I never claimed Jesus would. Well, I wouldn’t feel the need to explain anything to them as there are already many, many, many days on the calendar that carve them out for recognition. I would also maybe laugh at them for thinking it was because I was “afraid of Christians”. Then I would go call their attempt at mocking as “rage farming” It’s a shame those days didn’t get their due as they only get 1 a year

I’m not prepared to go that far, as I haven’t studied each President in detail, however many are not without sin for sure. But let’s rage farm (not you) about Israel defending themselves from constant attacks, of which those attacks by Hamas will inevitably lead to innocent lives lost directly or from Israeli counter attacks.

The only way to eat shrimp and grits is to eat the shrimp and throw out the grits or give it to a dog. Shrimp is good though. By itself, in a Boil, or with pasta.

Wait till the poster understands how many innocents Obama blew to pieces with drones.

Again, you fail to understand what’s being said Not sure what you mean by MAGA as I’m the one posting, however, the rage farm certainly can be applied both ways as you and others “rage” against a simple suggestion being made. Just an FYI, the day was “created” by some activist in Michigan. That would be Michigan if the good ol USofA. This isn’t as International as you would love it to be. Not really some large international organization deciding this.

*Easter

He can arbitrarily Proclaim it acknowledge it a different day, for a once in a generation event convergence of events. Really not very hard to understand this. He’s doing the Proclamation.

How so

I’m sure it’s not very cheap. I think some of these progressive cities and or States are finding out what the southern areas have been battling for quite some time now and are finding out it’s not quite so easy to handle to situation. Most of the migrants are good people and want to work hard and the we could use more labor, but it has to be done in a controlled manner that doesn’t hammer the system too much/too often (I know you aren’t disputing any of that in your post, I was just getting it out there). The progressives that talk about how we need to take care of everyone, everyone should be allowed in whenever they get here, don’t fully grasp the logistics and cost until they see the pain for themselves. As you stated above, that seems to be happening a bit in the Denver area.

I guess I’ll be the one to ask the question that everyone wants to know……Are the sister hot?

Hmmmmm……not very sanctuary city’ish of them.

for #1) this kinda is how I view it too. For #2) he coulda maybe possibly just took ownership of it instead of denying it. He coulda also said “hey, in honor of the upcoming Easter Holiday, we are gonna proclaim this day on Saturday this year while also remembering the 25 other days of remembrance coming up later in the year. For #3) if we are gonna make a funny, then It’s not very inclusive of him to deny a press release about all the other days of remembrance if we are going for inclusiveness.