Archy1221

I think we can all agree that it doesn’t matter what party is in charge, this happens, but to the specific time period you are addressing, Democrats controlled the power of the purse. By you Which was wrong

So I didn’t actually say what you claimed I said Thank you for acknowledging.

Once again you are flat out making s#!t up. Why is beyond me, but it’s what you do. #1) I didn’t deny anything, I said you weren’t comparing apples to apples. Your reading comprehension isn’t very good. #2) The two people in the tweet you posted were not talking about the same thing, but Ron and by proxy, you, tried to make them similar. —-one made a point about truckers legally immigrating. —-one tried to take that statement and take it back to something entirely different. Will you or Ron be posting facts to show Republicans say all people coming across the southern border (legally or illegally) are Covid positive, fentanyl using, etc, etc, etc…people. And how that even remotely compares to what the other person said. And as far as the “white truckers” race baiting you are attempting, look into how many Middle East truckers are part of that protest.

Here we have @Scarletwanting to compare an apple to a banana to make a point. compare similar things when you want to make a point.

Where was “greatest accomplishment” mentioned? You know, the thingy you claimed I indicated earlier?

#goodslogan Why did you not include the actual initial question that @funhuskerasked? Hint…because it would show you making s#!t up again. The question he asked was what made Trump different than others in the 2016 Primary, NOT what I thought was his greatest accomplishment. Be better.

On another note…

Why did not a single person around him get charged with anything Russia related? There is no “legal mechanism” to prevent anyone else from being charged.

I think this or the other NY investigation gives him/his company way more legal jeopardy than any Russia/Mueller related investigation ever did. Those looks like it could have some meat on its bone.

When did I indicate this? edit to include full quote: I could see that since his greatest accomplishment as president, as even you have indicated, was not completing a wall.

You kinda forgot to mention where they said “for illegal purposes”. Similar to how one can buy a gun, legally, but use it for illegal purposes.

LOL, you do know when someone from a foreign country says “I’m going to America” they always mean USA Right? #PeakTDS

#knowwhatyouspeakof #tryandtrollbetter #VenezuelahasneverbeenknownasAmerica #NeitherhasEcuador

I’m saying what I said…..TDS. I mean the slogan letters have specific words attached to them. Will Ecuador be using it soon? Venezuela? Maybe Sudan or Sweden? Why wouldn’t people from another country use America in a slogan. Maybe i should have said peak TDS.

Ya we’ve been over that. Thanks for proving my @Scarlet’s whataboutism problem

Looks like your tweeter deleted its tweet. Nice source!

https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/donald-trump-really-was-spied-on-2016-clinton-campaign-john-durham-court-filing-11644878973 The new shocker relates to the data Mr. Joffe and friends were mining. According to Friday’s filing, as early as July 2016 Mr. Joffe was “exploit[ing]” his “access to non-public and/or proprietary Internet data,” including “Internet traffic pertaining to . . . the Executive Office of the President of the United States (“EOP”).” The filing explains that Mr. Joffe’s employer “had come to access and maintain dedicated servers for the EOP as part of a sensitive arrangement whereby it provided [internet services]” to the White House. Mr. Joffe’s team also was monitoring internet traffic related to Trump Tower, and Mr. Trump’s apartment on Central Park West. White House communications are supposed to be secure, and the notion that any contractor—much less one with ties to a presidential campaign—could access them is alarming enough. The implication that the data was exploited for a political purpose is a scandal that requires investigation under oath. The filing suggests the data collection continued into the Trump Presidency. Mr. Durham says that on Feb. 9, 2017, Mr. Sussmann met with a second federal agency (“Agency-2”) to provide “an updated set of allegations,” and that these “allegations relied, in part, on the purported [internet traffic] that [Mr. Joffe] and others had assembled pertaining to Trump Tower, Donald Trump’s New York City apartment building, the EOP” and a healthcare provider.

Fixed it for you

Now Canadians want to Make America Great Again?? Next level TDS

So the one that had zero convictions on what was the primary investigation. Not even someone around the target was convicted for the primary investigation. Cohen for tax evasion and lying, Manafort for pre-election issues and the Florida guy for lying. So regardless of the President, why no one else?

Couldn’t agree more.

Most of those are Russians who had the indictments dropped.

Each one of these links simply state his allegations, which is that he's making claims in court that the Clinton Campaign spied on Trump. Those claims may be accurate, or they may be inaccurate. Correct, however, you said no one is taking it seriously. These news articles disagree with you. They take it seriously enough to spend resources covering it.

That’s fine by me. Maybe stop seeing Doctors that graduates from northwestern East New Mexico State medical school