That's your take away from this? That Lee isn't that good? Seriously?*Woosh*
Or you could actually offer your thoughts
It's pretty easy to parse from my original post: Lee has been the hot new thing the entire winter/spring, with multiple stories (and multiple posters) fawning over him. Now, we've got the prerequisite POB article to level whatever media "playing field" there is.
So yeah, in other words you weren't really being sarcastic. Instead of reading this as "hey, there's some real depth" you read it as "Psssh, now the projected starter is getting beat out by the expected backup. Rablle rabble rabble."
Just because it went over your head doesn't mean it wasn't there.
I also don't buy that there's "real depth" at the position, either. None of them have played a meaningful snap at Nebraska.
Nothing went over my head. It was the same kind of pessemistic comment regarding Lee I've seen you post several times, hence why I made my original comment.
And really? No real depth? Smfh...
It was really meant as tongue-in-cheek, but take it however you want it. And yea, I haven't bought into the Lee hype. A 50% completion percentage at Tulane doesn't move my needle, but I'll eat that crow if he earns the job and plays well next year.
And how many combined snaps have the top two potential QBs taken at Nebraska? How about the top 3? Can we let them actually prove that there's depth at the position?