Pedro Guerrero Posted October 8, 2006 Share Posted October 8, 2006 This just makes up for the non-catch TD they got in 04. Or the two tackles/blocks by Hicks on their first TD drive. So we can say we are even now. Quote Link to comment
DaveH Posted October 8, 2006 Share Posted October 8, 2006 Yeah, it was definitely a touchdown. The referee was checking out a cheerleader, I think. Yea, I don't know if he didn't see that he had posession when he had his other foot down because he was staring down that play. Quote Link to comment
foote_21 Posted October 8, 2006 Share Posted October 8, 2006 The touchdown catch was not a catch because he did not have possesion yet. Sure he had the ball in his hands with one foot in, but he had not secured the ball yet. If he takes another step and he is inbounds on drops the ball it isn't a catch. The recieve must secure the ball for it to be a catch and he did not do that until his next step, which put him out of bounds. Read the rule book before you challenge the call, obviously the guy in the booth was thinking the same thing. Quote Link to comment
I See Red People Posted October 8, 2006 Share Posted October 8, 2006 I think if it was reviewed it wouldn't have been enough to overturn it. His foot looked like it came off the ground before he secured it. Quote Link to comment
ttheKid1*18 Posted October 8, 2006 Share Posted October 8, 2006 The touchdown was being juggled imo. They always stop the video when he first gets it, but adjusts it as he goes out of bounds. Even if it is a td though, we win 28-21 though... Quote Link to comment
BIGREDIOWAN Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 and that is all that matters Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.