REDSTEEL Posted September 29, 2007 Share Posted September 29, 2007 4-1 is alot better than 1-4 no matter how you look at it Waking up with four coyote uglies and missing out on the one hottie is better then nailing the one hottie and being turned down by the four hairlipped 300 pound girls? See it's not always better but, Ill agree on the Win loss thing. Quote Link to comment
Husker B Posted September 29, 2007 Share Posted September 29, 2007 4-1 is alot better than 1-4 no matter how you look at it Waking up with four coyote uglies and missing out on the one hottie is better then nailing the one hottie and being turned down by the four hairlipped 300 pound girls? See it's not always better but, Ill agree on the Win loss thing. This makes no sense whatsoever. I see what you were trying to do, but it doesn't relate at all. Good try. Quote Link to comment
Axl_sued_me Posted September 29, 2007 Share Posted September 29, 2007 We are................. Mediocre Quote Link to comment
Husker B Posted September 29, 2007 Share Posted September 29, 2007 We are................. Mediocre Last time I checked, a winning percentage of .800 is a bit above mediocre, but whatever you think. Quote Link to comment
Redman Posted September 29, 2007 Share Posted September 29, 2007 We are................. Mediocre Quote Link to comment
REDSTEEL Posted September 29, 2007 Share Posted September 29, 2007 B)--> QUOTE(Husker B @ Sep 29 2007, 06:32 PM) 227288[/snapback] We are................. Mediocre Last time I checked, a winning percentage of .800 is a bit above mediocre, but whatever you think. Thats what Solich thought to look where it got him. Quote Link to comment
Husker B Posted September 29, 2007 Share Posted September 29, 2007 B)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Husker B @ Sep 29 2007, 06:32 PM) 227288[/snapback]</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--> We are................. Mediocre Last time I checked, a winning percentage of .800 is a bit above mediocre, but whatever you think. Thats what Solich thought to look where it got him. Yeah, and that is totally relevant to today. Solich's teams weren't mediocre either. Quote Link to comment
Bugeater Posted September 29, 2007 Share Posted September 29, 2007 B)--> QUOTE(Husker B @ Sep 29 2007, 06:32 PM) 227288[/snapback] We are................. Mediocre Last time I checked, a winning percentage of .800 is a bit above mediocre, but whatever you think. Yeah, like that % is going to continue. Two of those wins are against non-bcs conference teams and another against the worst team in our division. Have you looked at our remaining schedule? Quote Link to comment
HSKRNOKC Posted September 29, 2007 Author Share Posted September 29, 2007 lol @ this thread LOL @ this sorry azz comment I'm quoting. This is a good topic showing support. Threadkillers can move along. It's just an opinion Adolph. You have called a couple of folks Adolph. Are you refering to Hitler? If so this is name calling and a board rule violation. I would prefer you refrain from using that again please. Quote Link to comment
Bugeater Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 lol @ this thread LOL @ this sorry azz comment I'm quoting. This is a good topic showing support. Threadkillers can move along. It's just an opinion Adolph. You have called a couple of folks Adolph. Are you refering to Hitler? If so this is name calling and a board rule violation. I would prefer you refrain from using that again please. Very well, but I felt he was encouraging censorship, something that this board doesn't do. Quote Link to comment
HSKRNOKC Posted September 30, 2007 Author Share Posted September 30, 2007 lol @ this thread LOL @ this sorry azz comment I'm quoting. This is a good topic showing support. Threadkillers can move along. It's just an opinion Adolph. You have called a couple of folks Adolph. Are you refering to Hitler? If so this is name calling and a board rule violation. I would prefer you refrain from using that again please. Very well, but I felt he was encouraging censorship, something that this board doesn't do. Just expressing his opinion. That is encouraged. Name calling is not. Quote Link to comment
TarheelTrojan Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 4-1 with the only loss to the #1 team I will take it anyday. Congrats Huskers! A win is a win is a win however unglamorous the details are. Quote Link to comment
HSKRNOKC Posted September 30, 2007 Author Share Posted September 30, 2007 lol @ this thread LOL @ this sorry azz comment I'm quoting. This is a good topic showing support. Threadkillers can move along. It's just an opinion Adolph. You have called a couple of folks Adolph. Are you refering to Hitler? If so this is name calling and a board rule violation. I would prefer you refrain from using that again please. Very well, but I felt he was encouraging censorship, something that this board doesn't do. Just expressing his opinion. That is encouraged. Name calling is not. Back to topic please Quote Link to comment
Bugeater Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 lol @ this thread LOL @ this sorry azz comment I'm quoting. This is a good topic showing support. Threadkillers can move along. It's just an opinion Adolph. You have called a couple of folks Adolph. Are you refering to Hitler? If so this is name calling and a board rule violation. I would prefer you refrain from using that again please. Very well, but I felt he was encouraging censorship, something that this board doesn't do. Just expressing his opinion. That is encouraged. Name calling is not. He didn't think my opinion belonged in this thread which is essentially a personal attack on me. So am I to understand that personal attacks are fine as long as no name-calling is involved? Quote Link to comment
HSKRNOKC Posted September 30, 2007 Author Share Posted September 30, 2007 Im not naive. i realise that we have a ways to go but 4-1 isnt shabby. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.