holvy83 Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 Read on SI.com how one of their CFB writers believes that the Pac 10 needs to look to Texas for expansion. I know Texas is a cash cow, but with Texas having such an influence on the Big 12 it makes no sense on why the Pac 10 would be a better fit, and also a worse geographical nightmare then the Big 10 would be. This whole expansion talk is getting more ridiculous by the minute... Quote Link to comment
manitobahusker Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 i cant see it happening...only thing i can see is CU moving over. Quote Link to comment
holvy83 Posted February 12, 2010 Author Share Posted February 12, 2010 it mentions CU in the article, but they would be a 2nd or 3rd choice b/c of revenue they would bring to the Pac-10 Quote Link to comment
jayhawk Posted February 13, 2010 Share Posted February 13, 2010 I think the Pac 10 should add BYU and Utah. Too bad those states are small. I actually wish the NCAA ran the whole thing and the conferences were not simply a cash generation machine. Quote Link to comment
jnkyrdoff6 Posted February 13, 2010 Share Posted February 13, 2010 I think the Pac 10 should add BYU and Utah. Too bad those states are small. I actually wish the NCAA ran the whole thing and the conferences were not simply a cash generation machine. It'd still be a cash generation machine, only for ESPN and other special interests because they'd would just influence the NCAA to organize everything so they can make the most money. I mean if you want to give a governing body complete control, let's let congress decide . Realistically, all of this reorganization talk is , at least right now. Quote Link to comment
rawhide-jr Posted February 14, 2010 Share Posted February 14, 2010 I wish it was like it used to be and conferences were regional... Quote Link to comment
Vuren Posted February 14, 2010 Share Posted February 14, 2010 I think the Pac 10 should add BYU and Utah. Too bad those states are small. I actually wish the NCAA ran the whole thing and the conferences were not simply a cash generation machine. byu never will happen, stanford will not vote for them, and you need a 10-0 vote a team to be let in. Quote Link to comment
jayhawk Posted February 14, 2010 Share Posted February 14, 2010 I think the Pac 10 should add BYU and Utah. Too bad those states are small. I actually wish the NCAA ran the whole thing and the conferences were not simply a cash generation machine. byu never will happen, stanford will not vote for them, and you need a 10-0 vote a team to be let in. Because Stanford likes being the only private school? Doesn't like Mormons? What is Stanford's issue with BYU? Quote Link to comment
huKSer Posted February 14, 2010 Share Posted February 14, 2010 I think the Pac 10 should add BYU and Utah. Too bad those states are small. I actually wish the NCAA ran the whole thing and the conferences were not simply a cash generation machine. And what states are those? Quote Link to comment
sarge87 Posted February 15, 2010 Share Posted February 15, 2010 Here's a rule that CU, and UT for that matter, need to keep in mind: The Big 12 requires two years notice by an exiting team with a penalty of 50 percent of the league cut for those two years in limbo. The filing deadline for such notice is July 1st. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.