NUance Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 Man do they ever benefit from location You mean Cal, right, not Washington? Quote Link to comment
Treand3 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 Man do they ever benefit from location You mean Cal, right, not Washington? I actually meant UCLA Quote Link to comment
NUance Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 Man do they ever benefit from location You mean Cal, right, not Washington? I actually meant UCLA Yeah, that makes more sense than either of the others. UCLA must have 15 or 20 million people to draw from in Californica alone (incl SD and SF). And only USC (mostly) as the FBS school to beat out. Still, UCLA just can't seem to get their shiite together. Even with all the advantages they have. Quote Link to comment
Nexus Posted January 18, 2012 Author Share Posted January 18, 2012 It'll be interesting to keep an eye on UCLA the next few years from a recruiting standpoint under the new staff. Their best recruiter will likely be Adrian Klemm. He was Rivals non-BCS recruiter of the year in 2010 while at SMU. He'll be the Tosh Lupoi of Southern California. The guy has 3 Super Bowl rings when he played for the Patriots as an OL. He's young like Lupoi and relates well with high school athletes. I expect him to do real well recruiting in California. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.