dylan Posted February 4, 2012 Share Posted February 4, 2012 as others have pointed out, it is one of the foundations of our strong walk-on program. probably the most important factor is that kids know that they will be treated just like the scholarship kids and be given a chance to compete on equal footing. after that though, the promise that they can earn a scholarship by proving it on the field is a big selling point. another way to look at it is that 2-3 scholarships given to walk-ons per year probably gives enough hope to land 3-5 times that many walk-ons every year, meaning that we're getting a lot of bang for our buck for those scholarships (particularly given that the players that get them have already proven to be major contributors). we've got the walk-on program chugging again, let's not mess with one of it's major underpinnings. it's one of the few major advantages we have. Quote Link to comment
flatwaterfan Posted February 5, 2012 Share Posted February 5, 2012 Since we had a smaller scholarship class this year, it was there intent to sign a larger walkon class. The football squad is bound by locker room space so there is a limit there. I don't think you will see a squad over 150. Quote Link to comment
EZ-E Posted February 5, 2012 Share Posted February 5, 2012 You give a scholarship to a walk-on if he is better than your scholarshipped player at that same spot in my opinion. Why does a guy like Coffey or Nick Ash still have Choi's scholarship? Quote Link to comment
zoogs Posted February 5, 2012 Share Posted February 5, 2012 Yeah - I think walk-ons earn their scholarships and other players lose them by not contributing. They don't get the scholarships left over from not recruiting a full class. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.