LJS, crying shame

[NUance]

LJS, crying shame

 

WHen I first glanced at the thread title I thought it said, "LJS, crying game". Which left me perplexed. And amused.

[Husker_x]

In this day and age with how easy it is for people with direct access to the program to post whatever they want, places like the LJS or OWH are anything but indispensable. You want to charge10 bucks a month? Okay. For what, exactly? Between the months of March and August if I get any football news at all, half of it is fluffy fluff puff pieces about team unity and crap like that. Else it's ginning up news that wasn't there before like: Is Bo the guy for Nebraska?

 

Waah, waah Bo has a closed program during the summer and there's no player interviews. Boo hoo. Not my problem. Don't charge me to read your piffle.

[bshirt]

In this day and age with how easy it is for people with direct access to the program to post whatever they want, places like the LJS or OWH are anything but indispensable. You want to charge10 bucks a month? Okay. For what, exactly? Between the months of March and August if I get any football news at all, half of it is fluffy fluff puff pieces about team unity and crap like that. Else it's ginning up news that wasn't there before like: Is Bo the guy for Nebraska?

 

Waah, waah Bo has a closed program during the summer and there's no player interviews. Boo hoo. Not my problem. Don't charge me to read your piffle.

 

 

I too can hardly believe anybody would pay money for the fluff junk those guys crank out seven months a year. Even during the season, what great insight do they bring? Nothing. Just some silly article they'll try so very hard to spin as controversial.

 

I don't miss them at all.

[huKSer]

Since it is a premium channel here, I get BTN Aug-Dec then drop it.

 

Probably do the same with LJS, but not the OWH.

 

Really just want the Sunday paper 14 times per year

[HuskerFanChuck]

Interesting. So I swear the first time the LJS warned me about the number of articles I had read, they had it set at 10. Now, I get a note about the fact that I've read 4 out of 15. Interesting... so only a week or so after they shifted to this model, and they've already upped the number of free articles? o.O Maybe their subscription model didn't get the numbers they expected... or even close. Maybe they also figured out that people figured out how to get around the system. Be interesting to see how the model gets revamped further.