husker_99 Posted September 29, 2013 Share Posted September 29, 2013 I don't think you have any friggin' idea what you're talking about.... Like usual... i didn't see many 3 and outs...wonder why that was...finally a qb that is a leader. 1 Quote Link to comment
bimmerman323i Posted September 29, 2013 Share Posted September 29, 2013 Not many three and outs...because it was SDSU...big leap to think the offense's success was solely because Martinez didn't play. Not taking anything away from Armstrong and Kellogg, but there wouldn't have been many three and outs regardless of who was playing QB. Quote Link to comment
True2tRA Posted September 29, 2013 Share Posted September 29, 2013 Not many three and outs...because it was SDSU...big leap to think the offense's success was solely because Martinez didn't play. Not taking anything away from Armstrong and Kellogg, but there wouldn't have been many three and outs regardless of who was playing QB. I disagree. That's the best our offense has looked in quite some time. If TA gets the start against Illinois, I believe we will look good once again. It's okay, we can disagree. It's a part of life. Quote Link to comment
bimmerman323i Posted September 29, 2013 Share Posted September 29, 2013 Not saying TA didn't look great, and I agree that was the best the O looked in a long time. I just think you can't discount the opposition - very average FCS defense - or the fact the game followed a week of simplifying the offense. It's tough for me to think the output would have been much different if Martinez would have played. But you're right, it's okay for us to disagree. Quote Link to comment
zoogs Posted September 29, 2013 Share Posted September 29, 2013 I don't think you have any friggin' idea what you're talking about.... Like usual... i didn't see many 3 and outs...wonder why that was...finally a qb that is a leader. Even if TA is the second coming you're going to see more 3 and outs against tougher competition. If we're going to build up TA we could do it more reasonably. And maybe not in a defense thread Quote Link to comment
True2tRA Posted September 29, 2013 Share Posted September 29, 2013 Oh I don't discount the opposition. It's just that even if he did it against Illinois, i have a feeling the same people would say...well its just Illinois.....blah blah blah Quote Link to comment
True2tRA Posted September 29, 2013 Share Posted September 29, 2013 It becomes a discussion of "who do you support". Taylor Martinez? Or this Nebraska Football Team? Much like the Bo Peelini conversation at this point. Quote Link to comment
Saunders Posted September 29, 2013 Author Share Posted September 29, 2013 I don't think you have any friggin' idea what you're talking about.... Like usual... i didn't see many 3 and outs...wonder why that was...finally a qb that is a leader. Or it could be because we played a defense that was a little bit better than Idaho State and easily the 2nd worse defense we've played in 5+ years. But it's probably because Taylor isn't a leader like your Jedi mind reading skills told you. Quote Link to comment
Saunders Posted September 29, 2013 Author Share Posted September 29, 2013 Not many three and outs...because it was SDSU...big leap to think the offense's success was solely because Martinez didn't play. Not taking anything away from Armstrong and Kellogg, but there wouldn't have been many three and outs regardless of who was playing QB. I disagree. That's the best our offense has looked in quite some time. The best they've looked since Idaho State. Quote Link to comment
husker_99 Posted September 29, 2013 Share Posted September 29, 2013 I don't think you have any friggin' idea what you're talking about.... Like usual... i didn't see many 3 and outs...wonder why that was...finally a qb that is a leader. Or it could be because we played a defense that was a little bit better than Idaho State and easily the 2nd worse defense we've played in 5+ years. But it's probably because Taylor isn't a leader like your Jedi mind reading skills told you. TM doesn't have the swag that TA does. 1 Quote Link to comment
Saunders Posted September 29, 2013 Author Share Posted September 29, 2013 I don't think you have any friggin' idea what you're talking about.... Like usual... i didn't see many 3 and outs...wonder why that was...finally a qb that is a leader. Or it could be because we played a defense that was a little bit better than Idaho State and easily the 2nd worse defense we've played in 5+ years. But it's probably because Taylor isn't a leader like your Jedi mind reading skills told you. TM doesn't have the swag that TA does. Oh, now we're talking about swag and other intangibles that you can see from your couch or the stands.... Quote Link to comment
husker_99 Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 I don't think you have any friggin' idea what you're talking about.... Like usual... i didn't see many 3 and outs...wonder why that was...finally a qb that is a leader. Or it could be because we played a defense that was a little bit better than Idaho State and easily the 2nd worse defense we've played in 5+ years. But it's probably because Taylor isn't a leader like your Jedi mind reading skills told you. TM doesn't have the swag that TA does. Oh, now we're talking about swag and other intangibles that you can see from your couch or the stands.... well Tmart just needs to be benched whether injured or not. Quote Link to comment
HuskerShark Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 TM doesn't have the swag that TA does. That's a little racist, don't you think? Quote Link to comment
husker_99 Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 TM doesn't have the swag that TA does. That's a little racist, don't you think? how? Quote Link to comment
HuskerShark Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 TM doesn't have the swag that TA does. That's a little racist, don't you think? how? Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.