Saunders Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 Regular season, or everything? Quote Link to comment
carlfense Posted May 30, 2014 Author Share Posted May 30, 2014 Regular season, or everything? Everything. Quote Link to comment
Count 'Bility Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 How do you get half a loss? Is that when we only beat Mcneese St by 21 and/or FAU by 14? Or is it when we lose @Wisconsin by only 6 and/or at Michigan St by 8? Just askin. #expectations But in all seriousness, I say more than 3.5. As in 4. When you do that every year for 6 years, there no sense whatsoever to logically think it could be different when looking at current circumstances. But it's also a lot about how we get there. In our losses this year, I see us being much MUCH more competitive from a scoreboard standpoint. I see us analyzing the losses from a "what if" standpoint as opposed to last years "we just suck". One of these losses I expect to be in the CCG and/or bowl game. Quote Link to comment
carlfense Posted May 30, 2014 Author Share Posted May 30, 2014 How do you get half a loss? 1 Quote Link to comment
carlfense Posted May 30, 2014 Author Share Posted May 30, 2014 I see us analyzing the losses from a "what if" standpoint as opposed to last years "we just suck". . . . eh? All the talk about injuries, turnovers, etc. wasn't discussing from a "what if" standpoint? 1 Quote Link to comment
Count 'Bility Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 I see us analyzing the losses from a "what if" standpoint as opposed to last years "we just suck". . . . eh? All the talk about injuries, turnovers, etc. wasn't discussing from a "what if" standpoint? even with all that talk, there was still a large contigent of "we just suck.". I just think the losses next year will have a different tone. Granted guys like me spew excuses and such, but at the end of the day, our each of our losses last year were games that were in hand and over at the 5 minute mark. I just dont see that happening this year. Quote Link to comment
Saunders Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 You should rephrase it with an over/under on 3.5 losses. Quote Link to comment
carlfense Posted May 30, 2014 Author Share Posted May 30, 2014 You should rephrase it with an over/under on 3.5 losses. That's what I was shooting for . . . my lack of gambling experience is showing. Quote Link to comment
NUpolo8 Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 I am going the national writer route and say more than 3.5, just because that's the way it's gone recently. But I wouldn't be any more or less surprised by a 12-2 than a 8-6, either one I could see Quote Link to comment
Saunders Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 You should rephrase it with an over/under on 3.5 losses. That's what I was shooting for . . . my lack of gambling experience is showing. I've never gambled! But I am probably going to vegas again right after Labor Day. Quote Link to comment
carlfense Posted May 30, 2014 Author Share Posted May 30, 2014 But I wouldn't be any more or less surprised by a 12-2 than a 8-6, either one I could see That doesn't fit with your caricature. Quote Link to comment
NUpolo8 Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 But I wouldn't be any more or less surprised by a 12-2 than a 8-6, either one I could see That doesn't fit with your caricature. Shocker. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.