gamecocks Posted March 20, 2006 Share Posted March 20, 2006 Wow, some people have the homer glasses on. I believe that VY is the better player and the better leader off the two. Texas offense did not have the star athletes that OU did on their offense in 2000. I would take VY. Quote Link to comment
DJR313 Posted March 21, 2006 Share Posted March 21, 2006 That's pretty sad. I think Taylor is an awesome quarterback for OUR team like they do with Heupel, but for christ's sake, give credit where credit is due. Quote Link to comment
HSKRNOKC Posted March 21, 2006 Author Share Posted March 21, 2006 That's pretty sad. I think Taylor is an awesome quarterback for OUR team like they do with Heupel, but for christ's sake, give credit where credit is due. Exactly. Vince Young is an athletic speciman. He can single handed take over a game. Huepel was very competant. In NO way is he Vince Young. Quote Link to comment
pigsonthewing Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 well VY only beat OU once out of 2 or 3 attempts... that can explain a little of the bias... Quote Link to comment
HSKRNOKC Posted March 22, 2006 Author Share Posted March 22, 2006 I can understand that logic. I think that VY really matured last season though. He was a one man wrecking crew. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.