BigRedBuster

This could affect everything from coaches salaries to donations tied to tickets.

Ok....let’s look at this rationally. If a a law enforcement officer sees a lot of evidence that proves a person should not hold an office and then decides he is unfit for office, should he then be banned from investigating that person?

I’m still not understanding who is suppprting this action.

Remember when we had a president that was actually articulate?

He has such great twitter friends.

Yeah....even though we both agree the Republican Party is one big pile of zebra dung right now on many issues, during normal political times, we probably are at least on different planets.

You don't see a difference between a service like Twitter doing this compared to an ISP service?

I would think that Frost's system (simplified) would work well in Nebraska HS football. There are big linemen in Nebraska, just not every team has a full line of them. So, I would think that a more spread out offense would work with teams that have good athletes, just not a big over powering line. It would benefit the good athletes that teams have. I'm told that it's a relatively simple system also. It's not like a bunch of rout trees and rout options that you have to be next to an NFL QB to understand. So, the limited practice time HSs have could make this work.

Here's where I just don't understand the Republicans. They support certain issues that I see could come back to really bight them in the ass later. Let's say George Soros goes out and buys up the vast majority of ISP companies. Then, he manipulates liberal websites to be more prominent on the internet than conservative sites. Would they be happy then? Liberals wouldn't be happy if the Koch brothers would do that. Keeping Net Neutrality helps ensure voices are heard.

Thanks, and sorry if I misinterpreted your views. I was just hoping there was someone here that supported the other side and could explain it to me.

To answer your question, yes, the old voices in the party you have listed have lost their effectiveness and need replaced. I have been following Tulsi Gabbard on twitter. I don't always agree with her totally, but she is a fresh voice and I greatly respect her background.

So...you're saying I'm not important?

After living there 15 years and then moving back, I can agree with this.

An interesting read on the subject.

The internet is a much different animal now than in 2014. That's almost 4 years ago. That's a millennium in technology. Let me ask you this. Why do you support this move? I am honestly open to the argument from the other side. I just don't understand what that other side is and would like it explained to me. How was this regulation detrimental.

Seems like these two comments fit together. This staff is not going to waste their time right now on players that are just using us as a place holder.

So...answer me this. What is our marquee non-con game in 2020?

I'm not a fan of these games.

http://money.cnn.com/2017/12/14/technology/net-neutrality-repeal-explainer/index.html

Thanks.

I know what you are saying. But....this is the answer I'm trying to look past.

OK...I'm going to ask this knowing it may be hard to actually get what I'm looking for. Can anyone point to an article that articulates the purpose of doing this is? I know, the mantra if catering to big corporations..bla bla bla. But, the FCC has to have had some type of argument as to why they should do this. But..I didn't know the board was a partisan board.

I didn't realize the FCC was split between the two parties.

Why should he. He's talked to Putin about it.