BigRedBuster

I'm not laughing about it. It's stupid because it is stupid. Goats eat weeds. That's what the hell they do. Why the hell would they not fence off a place they want cleaned up and let them eat it down? Honestly, I've said before that unions have a purpose and they shouldn't go completely away. But, this is a prime example of why so many people get frustrated with them. It's f'ing goats eating weeds. This union leadership is looking for a fight and this is the best they could come up with.

They are getter no paid in weed.

But they hired the Grratest Of All Time. It's still an idiotic situation. F'ing goats are being used to eat down weeds.

A union complaining about goats. And people wonder why unions aren't respected sometimes.

Our thoughts align well.

So....this meeting with 8 people meeting multiple Russian operatives was so incidental that they just couldn't remember it when filling out forms.

So....you have a problem with the goats too?

This is just f'ing stupid.

This is why a blanket minimum wage or living wage law is either impossible or very vomplicated to implement. I know people in central nebraska with much less income living in a nice 2-3 bedroom home. $15 per hour might sound ok in Seattle but not for central Nebraska.

Are you still going to refuse to admit that you were the one who made the mental jump? He's going to want to throw the ball more because he wants to throw the ball more. That, the fact that he has a QB that will complete a higher percentage and the fact that he struggles to develop a diverse running game will all contribute to throwing more. So...he's just going to throw the ball more because he loves seeing the ball fly through the air?

Exactly. It's like he's trying to pick a fight for no reason.....on idiotic grounds. He could have chosen to reply to the point that a better passer doesn't make you need or necessarily want to pass more. But....he chose to pick one word out of my post and ignore every thing else.

Aaaaah.....

Ok....let's back up here. You were talking about if Langs was going to pass more this year with his QB. Now.....why go you think he thinks that's a good idea.....if that is what he wants to do. What possibly would motivate him to want to do that?

So.....nobody in this thread is discussing throwing the call more or running the ball more as it pertains to if we are going to have a better offense than last year. Nobody is talking about having a QB made for this system and if that's going to make our offense better. Question, if you're not debating this as to what would make our offense better......why exactly are you discussing it?

Still.....Seward???

Ok....I'm the only one surprised a kid this highly rated from St. Louis is at a camp in Seward?

Nebraska ran the ball 523 times and passed the ball 400 times last season, and was fourth in 3rd Down Conversions among the Big 10, ahead of both Michigan and Penn State. But whatever. Benning and Schaefer were having quite the Twitter conversation about it this morning. It's not that far fetched. I don't see why it's so hard to see people's skepticism about what kind of offense they're going to run. Supporters have been hanging their hats for two years on Langs getting a QB that can run his system. Then you try to act like he's not going to use that QB more? Doesn't make sense. Because you don't have to pass MORE to have the offense work better when you have a QB that can pass BETTER. It's actually a pretty simple concept. And that would be a great counter point if we were arguing about having a BETTER offense. But we aren't. The discussion was about if he uses the pass to set up the run or the pass to set up the pass. Someone pointed out last year we ran much more than we passed. Then, someone tried claiming it's obvious that he's going to pass more because now he has a QB that is made for his offense. That comment is meaningless. People are interested in seeing how a QB made for his offense can improve the offense NOT because now they will be passing it 50% more. It's because the passing plays they call will work better. So.....yes....that is what the conversation was about. No, it really wasn't. It's a lot more productive to talk about having a better offense. But that's not what we were talking about. You were the first one to talk about having a better offense. If we are better at passing the ball than we have been, don't you think we'll do it more? You're doing some great gymnastics trying to twist that around. And in doing so, your comments came back to mine. To answer your question, no....not necessarily. There are lots of offenses yfat pass better than us but don't necessarily call more pass plays. Will we????maybe. But it's not a forgone conclusion.

I have no problem with HSAs and think they should be used more. Just because they don't work hit everyone, doesn't mean they shouldn't be available. What I think is stupid are the rules around them. I can't use one because my plan doesn't qualify. Why go they give a rip what plan you have. I still have expenses that they would help with.

If he would greet my wife like he did her, there is no was in hell she would be sitting on the same side of the table as him.

Not much is heard about Bannon any more. There were reports that he was being pushed aside. I don't buy it. He still is in the west wing and influencing what happens. Which....should greatly concern everyone.

....to destroy the reputation of the USA. I'm sure he couldn't finish the quote because it was more than 140 characters.

Well, here is somewhat of a list. Now...every statement in here, you can bet there were 100 tweets saying the same thing over and over again. Every Russia story Trump said was a hoax by Democrats: A timeline

It's one thing to "recruit talent," which is an inexact science in itself, and another to develop it. Not many programs do it as well as Wisconsin. Since 2000, Wisconsin has produced 72 NFL Draft picks. In that same time-frame, Nebraska has had 68 players drafted. Nobody is arguing that point. Your draft picks stat sort of points out my point. The W/L record since joining the conference between the two is illogical. My point is that it's because of what's between the ears of each team. As much as Nebraska players have a mental block when it comes to playing Wisconsin, Wisconsin players have great confidence.

Nebraska ran the ball 523 times and passed the ball 400 times last season, and was fourth in 3rd Down Conversions among the Big 10, ahead of both Michigan and Penn State. But whatever. Benning and Schaefer were having quite the Twitter conversation about it this morning. It's not that far fetched. I don't see why it's so hard to see people's skepticism about what kind of offense they're going to run. Supporters have been hanging their hats for two years on Langs getting a QB that can run his system. Then you try to act like he's not going to use that QB more? Doesn't make sense. Because you don't have to pass MORE to have the offense work better when you have a QB that can pass BETTER. It's actually a pretty simple concept. And that would be a great counter point if we were arguing about having a BETTER offense. But we aren't. The discussion was about if he uses the pass to set up the run or the pass to set up the pass. Someone pointed out last year we ran much more than we passed. Then, someone tried claiming it's obvious that he's going to pass more because now he has a QB that is made for his offense. That comment is meaningless. People are interested in seeing how a QB made for his offense can improve the offense NOT because now they will be passing it 50% more. It's because the passing plays they call will work better. So.....yes....that is what the conversation was about.

That would all be fine and dandy if he had kept his mouth shut and fingers silent over the last 4 -6 months. But....he hasn't. He has constantly flapped his trap about how horrible and wrong and unfair this which hunt is and "fake news". He has constantly ridiculed anyone who would even think that anyone from his campaign would have anything to do with Russia. He has ridiculed anyone who even thinks that Russia meddled in our elections. .......only to have his own son expose that all of that was total BS. His ego is what requires him to say what he is now. If he just now shuts up and doesn't say anything, it's basically admitting he was full of BS all these months.....and he just can't do that. Oh yes....he had a choice. But, that was over the last 4-6 months when he was saying all the things he was saying......now......he's all in and has to keep going.