Jump to content

RunRedRun

Banned
  • Content Count

    259
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

85 Excellent

About RunRedRun

  • Rank
    Three-Star Recruit
  1. RedRun, I was hoping to put this to bed by pointing out exactly, in no uncertain terms, what my jesting response in post #7 referred to. Twice I pointed it out. But you just won't drop it. I am not going to penalize you for what you've said so far in this thread. But I won't be so forgiving next time. LOL. Why not post the real line, like I did.. and then you STILL reference it here...and are you also not "penalizing" yourself, since you was the first to make a personal attack? Do I need to walk you through that one as well? PS.. don't every try your hand as a litigator. you'd fail! I think you are completely missing his original point. I posted the line. His "point" is not in context to what we are discussing. its called deflection when you lost your point and have to revert, and try to move, the conversation to another topic.
  2. RedRun, I was hoping to put this to bed by pointing out exactly, in no uncertain terms, what my jesting response in post #7 referred to. Twice I pointed it out. But you just won't drop it. I am not going to penalize you for what you've said so far in this thread. But I won't be so forgiving next time. LOL. Why not post the real line, like I did.. and then you STILL reference it here...and are you also not "penalizing" yourself, since you was the first to make a personal attack? Do I need to walk you through that one as well? PS.. don't every try your hand as a litigator. you'd fail!
  3. That's the thing, we aren't going to fire Mike Riley in season one. No matter how bad the results. If we did, there is no way we'd be able to attract a decent coach. Lincoln would be toxic. People keep saying that, but no one provides any evidence. I'll head right over to Shawn Eichorst's house, tap on his bedroom window, and get a signed affidavit from him. And this would prove the coaching job is toxic how? The lack of logic here befuddles me! Wut? How would asking Eichorst if the coaching job would be toxic, PROVE that it would be toxic??? Follow the conversation line its not rocket science, or do we need Eichorst to sign off on that one as well? Read much, do you? My joking comment above about tapping on Eichorts' window had nothing to do with the toxicity of this place. So I said "wut?" Then I bolded the sentence, originally from post #3. I even increased the font size of the sentence in the hope that you would see it. Here, let me reproduce it below, so it won't go off on another one of your rages: Lest there is any misunderstanding, let me explain, in plain words, the joke of post #7: Since the media quoted in the OP above doesn't have a vote, and it's Shawn Eichorst's call as to whether he's going to fire Mike Riley, the only way for me to get evidence that we aren't going to fire Mike Riley in season one would be for me to go tap at his window and ask Shawn personally. (It was 4:00am when I typed that. Presumably he'd be in bed.) Are we done with this? Or do you want to start some other pointless argument? Boom! Get him NUance! get me how? this isn't even our conversation. looks like we have a crowd in the dunce line! It's just funny to me because you get all bent out of shape over the silliest things and start calling people stupid. LOL, your funny, always have been. Not bent out of shape at all just find it funny that some people on here are... well... that simple!
  4. That's the thing, we aren't going to fire Mike Riley in season one. No matter how bad the results. If we did, there is no way we'd be able to attract a decent coach. Lincoln would be toxic. People keep saying that, but no one provides any evidence. I'll head right over to Shawn Eichorst's house, tap on his bedroom window, and get a signed affidavit from him. And this would prove the coaching job is toxic how? The lack of logic here befuddles me! Wut? How would asking Eichorst if the coaching job would be toxic, PROVE that it would be toxic??? Follow the conversation line its not rocket science, or do we need Eichorst to sign off on that one as well? Let me walk you through the conversation (sad that it must be done)! YOU: That's the thing, we aren't going to fire Mike Riley in season one. No matter how bad the results. If we did, there is no way we'd be able to attract a decent coach. Lincoln would be toxic. BRO: People keep saying that, but no one provides any evidence. YOU: I'll head right over to Shawn Eichorst's house, tap on his bedroom window, and get a signed affidavit from him. ME: And this would prove the coaching job is toxic how? The lack of logic here befuddles me! YOU: Wut? ME: How would asking Eichorst if the coaching job would be toxic, PROVE that it would be toxic??? Follow the conversation line its not rocket science, or do we need Eichorst to sign off on that one as well? Pretty simple to follow. and I use simple in its most simplest form!
  5. That's the thing, we aren't going to fire Mike Riley in season one. No matter how bad the results. If we did, there is no way we'd be able to attract a decent coach. Lincoln would be toxic. People keep saying that, but no one provides any evidence. I'll head right over to Shawn Eichorst's house, tap on his bedroom window, and get a signed affidavit from him. And this would prove the coaching job is toxic how? The lack of logic here befuddles me! Wut? How would asking Eichorst if the coaching job would be toxic, PROVE that it would be toxic??? Follow the conversation line its not rocket science, or do we need Eichorst to sign off on that one as well? Read much, do you? My joking comment above about tapping on Eichorts' window had nothing to do with the toxicity of this place. So I said "wut?" Then I bolded the sentence, originally from post #3. I even increased the font size of the sentence in the hope that you would see it. Here, let me reproduce it below, so it won't go off on another one of your rages: Lest there is any misunderstanding, let me explain, in plain words, the joke of post #7: Since the media quoted in the OP above doesn't have a vote, and it's Shawn Eichorst's call as to whether he's going to fire Mike Riley, the only way for me to get evidence that we aren't going to fire Mike Riley in season one would be for me to go tap at his window and ask Shawn personally. (It was 4:00am when I typed that. Presumably he'd be in bed.) Are we done with this? Or do you want to start some other pointless argument? Boom! Get him NUance! get me how? this isn't even our conversation. looks like we have a crowd in the dunce line!
  6. That's the thing, we aren't going to fire Mike Riley in season one. No matter how bad the results. If we did, there is no way we'd be able to attract a decent coach. Lincoln would be toxic. People keep saying that, but no one provides any evidence. I'll head right over to Shawn Eichorst's house, tap on his bedroom window, and get a signed affidavit from him. And this would prove the coaching job is toxic how? The lack of logic here befuddles me! Wut? How would asking Eichorst if the coaching job would be toxic, PROVE that it would be toxic??? Follow the conversation line its not rocket science, or do we need Eichorst to sign off on that one as well? Read much, do you? My joking comment above about tapping on Eichorts' window had nothing to do with the toxicity of this place. So I said "wut?" Then I bolded the sentence, originally from post #3. I even increased the font size of the sentence in the hope that you would see it. Here, let me reproduce it below, so it won't go off on another one of your rages: Lest there is any misunderstanding, let me explain, in plain words, the joke of post #7: Since the media quoted in the OP above doesn't have a vote, and it's Shawn Eichorst's call as to whether he's going to fire Mike Riley, the only way for me to get evidence that we aren't going to fire Mike Riley in season one would be for me to go tap at his window and ask Shawn personally. (It was 4:00am when I typed that. Presumably he'd be in bed.) Are we done with this? Or do you want to start some other pointless argument? Its only pointless when you are proven wrong, you have a history. Anyone with an ounce of common sense can follow OUR line and see what you was being said. But PLEASE continue insulting me because your point was moronic at the least. ODD, that once AGAIN you, a MOD makes personal attacks about someone's ability to read! I bet you was that kid! PS.... Thanks for the link thread that wasn't even ours
  7. That's the thing, we aren't going to fire Mike Riley in season one. No matter how bad the results. If we did, there is no way we'd be able to attract a decent coach. Lincoln would be toxic. People keep saying that, but no one provides any evidence. I'll head right over to Shawn Eichorst's house, tap on his bedroom window, and get a signed affidavit from him. And this would prove the coaching job is toxic how? The lack of logic here befuddles me! Wut? How would asking Eichorst if the coaching job would be toxic, PROVE that it would be toxic??? Follow the conversation line its not rocket science, or do we need Eichorst to sign off on that one as well?
  8. That's the thing, we aren't going to fire Mike Riley in season one. No matter how bad the results. If we did, there is no way we'd be able to attract a decent coach. Lincoln would be toxic. People keep saying that, but no one provides any evidence. I'll head right over to Shawn Eichorst's house, tap on his bedroom window, and get a signed affidavit from him. And this would prove the coaching job is toxic how? The lack of logic here befuddles me!
  9. RunRedRun

    Coaching Nomination Thread

    Trev Alberts AD Riley stays with terms terms: Scott Frost OC
  10. RunRedRun

    We'll stand by the road

    I dont recall reading ANY bad press on fans being negitive towards our opponents? what does that have to do with wanting staff changes?
  11. RunRedRun

    Will it be an "ugly" Press Conference today?

    I would put that in the tough question catagory. I think it is fair but I also think we know the answer(s) Agreed, but I still want a reporter to sack up and ask it!
  12. RunRedRun

    Will it be an "ugly" Press Conference today?

    My question request - Mike, will there be staff changes at the end of the season and if not why?
  13. RunRedRun

    Nate Gerry

    Here, let me blow this one out of the water: "I am going to teach you to type a specific sentence by next Sunday (11/18/15). I will choose a sentence, teach you to type it. If and when you don't do as you are told, I will take away your keyboard, and your desktop, your laptop, your tablet, your smart phone, any and all of them. I will get disconnect your internet, and then cancel your phone plan, the entire lot of them. In short, you WILL type the sentence I have taught you to type BY 11/8/15, or you won't be typing ANYTHING to ANYONE, ANYWHERE." You can sit in a corner until you convince me that by giving you another chance, that sentence will appear as taught to you...oh, and I'll need $75.00 from you, not the previously agreed upon $50.00, that is if you want to back on the internet. See how that works? As Captain John MacDougall used to tell his recruits at Fort Carson: "I can't make any of you do anything you don't want to do...but I can sure as Hell make you wish you would have..."
  14. RunRedRun

    Chatelain: What now, Huskers?

    Ill take riley cleaning the closet and getting a grasp on this program, and boosters should be pushing this issue with Eichorst. Riley staff up grade or you, your choice!
×