Red Dead Redemption

Not quite. Uncle Barry will also pace back and forth between you and your plate of food as he tells his colonoscopy story. You are only able to take bites when he moves far enough to the side, and sometimes he walks very slowly, and your food is cold by the time you are able to take another bite. And every once in a while, Uncle Barry will stop dead in his tracks and prevent you from eating any more as he goes off on some tangent about how you are the 1000th person to hear his story that day, and he wants to give an Amazon/Walmart/etc. gift certificate and he refuses to move out of the way until you do. But the catch is you must give Uncle Barry your personal info before you can claim it. So your only option is to kill Uncle Barry and reset the day (like in the movie 'Edge of Tomorrow'), and hope that when you start the day over, Uncle Barry won't go off on a tangent again.

You're making a comparison to show that Trump says dumb things? That's a pretty low bar to step over. Don't hurt yourself.

A rise in victimhood culture leads to a rise in revenge culture.

Sen. Hirono: Democrats Have a Hard Time "Connecting" With People Because Of "How Smart We Are" https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/12/06/sen_hirono_democrats_have_a_hard_time_connecting_with_people_because_of_how_smart_we_are.html?fbclid=IwAR0st_YqGpGLXSUlpH3hR_lf9pwPPYAIPePQM6CW5cV4cD7TPDcxhVWPI50 "We have a really hard time doing that," Hirono lamented, "and one of the reasons it was told to me at one of our retreats was that we Democrats know so much, that is true. And we have kind of have to tell everyone how smart we are and so we have a tendency to be very left brain."

Ha! I never read that thread. Sorry. Great minds think alike...and so do we...

He was an anti-dentite?

Worked as expected, then

I hear ya. One starts to question, is UT doing for themselves as much as they are the boy? Pat themselves on the back? Virtue signalling? I dunno. Maybe the family's socioeconomic status justifies the extra help. Or maybe they are deliberately going over the top to put an exclamation point on how bad it is to bully. I dunno. I'm not going to think about that for a while. I'm just going to enjoy the feel-good parts of the story for the time being.

Be proud of being a Vols fan. This story made me cry. https://beta.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2019/09/09/fourth-grader-was-teased-his-homemade-university-tennessee-logo-then-ut-made-his-drawing-into-real-shirt/ https://abcnews.go.com/US/university-tennessee-offers-admission-year-scholarship-young-vol/story?id=65561186

Tito's

If you replied to that post, that is evidence that you looked at a picture of a nekkid child. Pervert!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1990/05/03/the-childrens-portraits-innocence-or-pornography/34fa3716-3c0d-4a83-9c23-cc16291274d3/ Capo, HuskerPowerVA, Have any of your friends ever shown you candid family photos such as their toddler in the bathtub? If so, then you are guilty of viewing "child pornography" and Jesse Helms instructs you to turn yourselves in to the nearest precinct so that you can be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. It's that black and white, folks. Context and circumstances don't matter. Are you looking at this picture below? An underaged, naked child? You are technically viewing "child pornography". TURN YOURSELF IN NOW!!!!!!

From 'Hope Floats', where Birdie starts working at the One Hour Photo and is given a briefing: "Occasionally, we get pictures of a somewhat questionable nature." "Naked pictures?" "Oh, we never comment on them. We just hand them over as if we hadn't seen a thing." "I understand, Mr. Davis." "But first, we make a copy. And we put them in the second drawer under the counter. And you can have a look any time you want. Just don't take any of them home with you."

Your surrender is duly noted, and your apology is accepted.

Now you are just making excuses. In the MW case, you implied its black and white -- clearly child pornography, mitigating circumstances don't matter The case I asked you about should be just as black and white. The dude admitted to stealing a truck. Is that not a felony? Now you are lying. I didn't say anything about your family. It was a hypothetical/fictional account using the "royal you". If it make you feel better, perhaps I should have phrased it as "as if one saw their cousin at a family reunion they recently had sex with." Oh, and your last sentence is a lie as well. I clearly stated earlier in this thread that I don't care if MW is a football player for ANY team or not, or just some random kid. While what MW did was morally wrong, the "child porn" charge is unjust.

For someone who previously implied a single piece of evidence clearly indicates circumstances are quite black and white, you now seem to be injecting a lot of gray...

I know, right? I asked you a simple yes/no question, and you avoided it as if one saw their cousin at a family reunion they recently had sex with.

Ad hominem attack FTW!!!!!111oneoneoneone ?lained ni s'ohw --> you

I mean, he stole a truck, which is typically a felony. Are you in denial of that?

Maybe you don't know this, but just because an event can "technically" can be defined as something prohibited by law, simply because certain boxes can be checked off, doesn't mandate that a specific charge needs to be filed. Circumstances and context are also taken into consideration.

Are you suggesting there might be mitigating circumstances? He broke the law. He stole a truck. It's black and white, isn't it? Should he be charged with a felony? Feel free to seek assistance from a resident 7th grader if you need help with answering a simple yes or no question