Archy1221

What do you think Abbott is actually trying to protect. My understanding is he is also following the science that suggests kids don’t have the capacity to make a life altering decision like this so why allow it?

Once again you won’t actually answer a legitimate question that’s asked of you.

What’s shameful is allowing these parents to do this to their kids. I can’t for the life of me understand why you think this is ok.

Do you literally not read a post before you reply to it? Whacked out dips#!t parents push this trans nonsense on their kids (in some cases less than 5 years old) because they are upset the birth of their child wasn’t the gender they wanted. Did I ever say people want to pick their own gender at birth? amazingly someone here compares not feeling well to parents fundamentally changing their kids body by taking drugs to stop puberty so eventually they can mentally abuse those kids long enough to make them want to have their d!(k chopped off and artificial vag made. You know, kinda like having the flu for a few days.

With your comment, are you telling us that you believe parents should be allowed to force/cohere/allow minors into sex change operations?????? To go against biological science because the parent didn’t get the gender they wanted at birth many times!!!! my opinion is good for Abbott because it’s bat s#!t f#&%ing crazy to allow an under 18 ye old go through any of that. No possible f#&%ing way they have the developed mental/emotional capability to go through that irrational process. Good lord it’s amazing people are actually for allowing that.

But Tom Cotton was ridiculed for being way ahead of the curve on this. thanks for nothing Anthony.

I wasn’t actually talking about the far far left.

Everyone you cited was still called a racist, some were called xenophobic, some were called homophobic, all were called anti-female, and some were called granny killers by the tolerant left. Every one of these people of character.

I’ve come to realize you can’t back up your claim with any actual relevant facts (LP must not have figured out their spin yet) and that’s why you keep making these odd reading comprehension mistakes. No point in going any further with you.

Did Trump admin not do sanctions against Russia? Did Ukrainian funding lapse? Did Trump supply Javelins? (What does Zelensky think of those). what sanctions did Trump admin ease up on that you speak about? If there were some, what did that effect? As a follow up, why did Dems filibuster a sanctions bill on Nord Stream?

You hate Trump so much that you aren’t reading simple posts correctly. You have a preconceived view of what someone says vs reading and comprehending what was actually said. You constantly “imply” things to your slant or wish instead of taking comments at face value. Get that Trump hatred out and you won’t have that problem going forward. Thanks for copying the post as it clearly shows I’m questioning why this didn’t happen during the 2016-2020 years and instead is happening now? Someone here even still tries to make the claim that Trump admin tries to destroy NATO. I’d that were actually true, 2016-2020 would have been an ideal time for this. But here we are in 2022. Why now? (Hint, that’s a question because I don’t know the answer).

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2018/03/05/dont-rehabilitate-obama-on-russia/amp/ But not everything is relative; we should not slip into collective amnesia over the Obama administration’s weak and underwhelming response to Russian aggression. Throughout his presidency, Obama consistently underestimated the challenge posed by Putin’s regime. His foreign policy was firmly grounded in the premise that Russia was not a national security threat to the United States. In 2012, Obama disparaged Mitt Romney for exaggerating the Russian threat—“the 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because the Cold War’s been over for 20 years,” Obama quipped. This breezy attitude prevailed even as Russia annexed Crimea, invaded eastern Ukraine, intervened in Syria, and hacked the Clinton campaign and the DNC. Obama’s response during these critical moments was cautious at best, and deeply misguided at worst. Even the imposition of sanctions on Russia for its invasion of Ukraine was accompanied by so much propitiation and restraint elsewhere that it didn’t deter Russia from subsequent aggression, including the risky 2016 influence operation in the United States. Obama, confident that history was on America’s side, for the duration of his time in office underestimated the damaging impact Russia could achieve through asymmetric means. France and Germany spearheaded the Minsk ceasefire process in 2014-2015, with U.S. support but without Washington at the table. The Obama administration did coordinate a far-ranging sanctions policy with the European Union—an important diplomatic achievement, to be sure. But to date, the sanctions have only had a middling effect on the Russian economy as a whole (oil and gas prices have hurt much more). And given that sanctions cut both ways—potential value is destroyed on both sides when economic activity is systematically prohibited—most of the sacrifice was (and continues to be) born by European economies, which have longstanding ties to Russia

That’s not how this works. I didn’t say Biden was causing the problems. I asked why Putin was doing this now? Maybe you read someone else’s post and got confused I can copy and paste mine for you if you want. But since you actually did make some claims, the evidence or rational behind them would be awesome.

What territory did Russia take from Ukraine, and when did it happen? How did Trump help with that?

It’s Tcell immunity that provides the longer lasting body response

Foods getting so expensive I’m about ready to tell the kids it’s hot dogs, spaghetti, or PBJ for dinner now on. Might treat them to a manwhich once a week though as a substitute to the old steak night

What was Trump doing for him? Not arming Ukraine? Nope Less NATO funding? Nope Nord Stream approval? Nope So what exactly did Trump do for Russia that they aren’t getting from Biden? Specifics would be great. your sound bites are cute and probably gives you lots of laughs but are meaningless stupid attacks. Have some substance at point.

USO options baby!!

Not sure as I don’t have a Republican talking machine. If your asking if those are my thoughts, the answer would be yes. If you would like to tell me what’s wrong with them instead of being, well, how are you being then great. Otherwise, why do you even reply?

What is factually incorrect about my post? What is your definition of reality then? Cause what I posted is what actually happened. nothing you stated in your second paragraph has a to do with the current Ukrainian/Russian issue our country currently faces? It’s just another “hey look over here” when confronted with the Reality of a Joe Biden presidency and where it has taken us. That way you don’t have to discuss the actual issues of the people actually in charge.

There is a decent chance that phasing out fossil fuels could make us more energy reliant on bad actor countries unless we come up with a plan to acquire or mine rate earth minerals

I still have this issue pretty regularly. Same for you?

Good thing the adults are back in charge at the WH! Those four years of peace were awful. Wonder why Putin is acting this way now? We were all told he had his stooge in place from 2016-2020. Why wouldn’t he have done all this then? Maybe everyone was talking about the wrong stooge? The one who, along with his Boss, told Romney to get out of the 80’s when talking Russia?

Maybe that’s why we are all kinda just hearing about this many years later

You will never fix this problem by just raising employee salaries. You couldn’t ever raise them enough because executives make most of their big money off options. ESO’s are what has caused the biggest portion of the C-level/employee compensation divide to expand so quickly.