knapplc

I would really like to see Suh overtake Spiller without resorting to cookie deletion and revoting. We have plenty of Husker fans to get it done.

It helps them get up for our rivalry.

Already taken care of. Killer is going to be focused on other things for a while. Don't tell him, but she's actually a secret Husker double agent sent from Lincoln to distract him while Suh overtakes Spiller.

Thanks. I did a text search for "outland" on the front page, but the title of the poll is a .gif, not text, so it didn't pick it up. Suh leads overall with 76% of the vote. He leads every state but Idaho, where he trails Iupati 70/24. Suh is beating Okung in Oklahoma 55/43.

Got a link?

That was more aimed at Cheshire and Captain K. Those kinds of gripes about another poster are what the woodshed is for.

It's all well and good to call me out for my obvious (and true) faults. But I'm a pretty boring subject, and here I'm definitely off-topic. If you want to start a "knapp is a douchebag" thread, the Woodshed is your spot. Have at me there. But here, let's focus on the football team. Ready.... BREAK!

Amen, brother! That guy is a TOOL! You have to wonder why they don't ban the guy. Obvious troll.

You can only vote once per day.

Passing Ingram within the hour....

If this guy doesn't get an invite to New York it's a travishamockery. I don't expect him to win the Heisman, but if the award wants to retain legitimacy, he has to be in the top five. Has to.

Nine wins is a big deal.

I'm hoping the whole chief/Indian rejoinder wasn't wasted - somewhat clever, yes? It's not my best work, but it was at least slightly amusing. I was doing another fake hurling post but deleted it - you can't go to that well too many times in one thread.

Congratulations, KC! She's a cutie!

I don't have the energy after a long day to look up who all it was, but most of our O Linemen have been dinged up this year. I would venture a guess that it's a combination of those guys getting hurt at various times, Rex getting hurt, Helu getting hurt and our WRs getting sent back down to the Scout Team that did it.

Spiller's next two opponents average 117 and 145 on the ground, so he's bound to get some pretty good yardage. All I want is to see Suh get a trip to New York. He'll never win the trophy, but it would be nice to see a defensive guy get some cred for once. And the fact that he plays for my team is gravy.

I still get a kick out of that "PLAAAGGHHHH" thing by the OP. He's a pretty funny guy.

Sadly, this is also very true. No matter how much a guy loves or hates Shawn Watson, this has to be laid at his feet. Injuries are one thing, but this group of guys is not a Spread Option team.

If only we had held the ball ONE MORE TIME against ISU, we'd be ranked in the mid-teens. <sigh>

Agreed! BEAT CU! Nothing else matters.

Well said, sir.

Spiller - 91,792 Suh - 77,187 Slightly over three hours. In that amount of time CJ has 526 votes. That's respectable. Suh has 2,875. That's dominant. I'm not very good at math, but I give Spiller... say... 24 hours, and then Suh is back at #1.

Not everyone is you. It's not a matter of gullibility either, chief. Doesn't matter who manufactured it or why, over the past 20 years NU vs. CU has produced some nailbiter games, some painful blowouts and some games of national signifigance. Nobody in the Big 12 North comes close in terms of memorable games. Of course you could go back 40 years to make your case. But that would be kinda stupid. It is a matter of gullability, Indian, because you're biting on a line dangled in front of your face. It's artificial - you said so yourself. So you're willing to hang on an artificial "rivalry" created because one coach decided he needed to boost his program, then perpetuated when a new conference needed to artificially generate interest in their new product. You swallowed it all: hook, line and sinker, and now you're trying to justify it. Sorry, you're still the same sucker W.C. Fields counted on 100 years ago. What minute were you born? Then, you asked the question, and I quote, "...doesn't it feel a bit better beating Colorado than Baylor?" I answered it. Don't get your panties in a twist because I didn't give the answer you were hoping for. And I don't have to go back 40 years to make my case. I just need to go back to the last four years - where we've won three out of four, the game meant nothing in relation to national standing, winning the conference, winning the division, or anything greater than beating Iowa State or Kansas State meant, and yet, because someone said it's a "rivalry," you're following along. KSU has produced, over the last 20 years, some "nailbiter games," games of "national significance," and some "painful blowouts." But, because nobody on either side of the game has told you it's a "rivalry," you ignore the fact that there has been similar significance. You can do what you're told if that makes you happy. Me, I'm going to think for myself. This isn't a rivalry. It never has been. Maybe someday it will be, and if it is, I'll be there to embrace it.

Spiller - 91,266 Suh - 74,312

Being a "good fan" takes work. It's far easier to be a D-Bag than to be kind to someone. You don't have to censor yourself, you don't have to concern yourself with someone else's feelings and you don't have to concern yourself with how you come across. Anyone who's read tigerboard.com or ksufans.com knows what happens when such things aren't considered important. It'd be great if everyone was concerned about being an ambassador for the ideals the Huskers try to live by, but way too often people just take the easy way out and make trolls of themselves online, or act like asshats when they're at the game, or while visiting someone else's stadium. I think the "good" fans, the ones who try to uphold that "greatest fans in the country" line, still outnumber the asshats. But sometimes it seems like the asshats are winning.