JHHusker

You talk like playing sub-par teams is a new thing. Central Florida ring a bell in 97-98? Akron in 97-98? North Texas in 93-94? Do I need to go on? Be realistic. UCF was kicking NU's arse. Luckily for NU they were in better shape and pulled out hte win in the 2nd half. By the way...the 'tradition' of giving hte opposing team a standing O after the game started at that game.

wait...wait...wait... I thought no one wanted to play the mighty Nebraska Cornhuskers and finding opponents in past years was next to impossible... I guess Pedey and Callahan are fearful of playing the mighty Houstonians....

I hope so...I also like the Texas-Michigan mathup

I know Trev is from NU and blah blah blah, but he's a tool. Just last night he came up with the weird notion that the B12 North division stinks. Thanks Trev...like I couldn't already see that back in October. The less Trev on ESPN, the happier I get. As for fixing the BCS...University presidents are gonna have to allow for a playoff...but the money from the bowl games will keep talking and make it near impossible.

Probably not. Money changes hands regardless of the outcome. That and it would be stupid to pull a contract based on one year's game. Colorado really couldn't do anything. It was pretty sad. I agree with DJR in that I think Iowa St. could have put up a better fight. Have you no sense of humor...geez louise. But I can't complain, without a major upset yesterday and Texas getting a BCS bid, my Ags moved up to become the sacrificial lamb in the Cotton Bowl against Tennessee.

I wonder if ABC regreted their Big XII Conference contract just for a day.

and you wanna know another secret...Nebraska fans are the same way... a few fans can ruin it for everyone. However, because a few act like arseholes doesn't mean they all do.

DaveH is to Nebraska football, as I am to the Chicago Cubs... There's always next year, and the year after, and the year after, and the year after....

5-4 this year, 8-2 this time last year, even with a weaker north division. I'm still trying to figure out Pedey's logic on this one.

That's not true. We scheduled some tough teams but we did have to get some cupcakes because we couldn't get anyone decent to come play at nebraska because they were to scared. Last time I checked a team consisted of player typically 18-23 years old (those are kids in my eyes). It came down to money, and sometimes teams wouldn't be willing to put hte home and home series. Basically the come here and play, but we aren't going there to play. Now a days home and home are pretty mcuh the only way games are scheduled (yes there are exceptions). However, at no time did a team not schedule another team because they were "scared." I'd really like to know why a team wouldn't want to play a consistantly rated top 5 team? It's a Nebraska football myth, always has been.

Benard- That's a bunch of poop that the AD put out. You can't tell me kids wouldn't want to play a top 5 team, because they were SCARED?!?!?!? Horse manure. So should NU not schedule USC if asked?

So $10K for the flag?!? Boy that's way too tempting for this poor college student...

Too bad you have no sense of humor. The Number 5 spot is a privilidged spot if you have paid any attention to the Bottom 10. Basically ESPN puts decent teams in if they get blown out or have a hgue mistake. This is not the only time Nebraska has wound up in the #5 spot. Besides this is a poll with such assnine remarks earlier in the season criticizing everything in Wyoming from the teams home unis, away unis, and even the band uniforms. Laugh every once in a while...it does a body good.

Steal the monsterous flag at the gas station at 84th and Cornhusker Hwy in Lincoln. That thing is friggin awesome to see when I roll in for gamedays.

who else lost by 60 last week? Husker Nation deserves it.