BIGREDIOWAN Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 How many snaps was he in on? We didn't really have the ball that much, especially in the first half. Maybe...........MAYBE 40% of thos snaps he was in on. Our defense was on the field all day. Quote Link to comment
admo Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 I think Keller's bread and butter play should be the quick slant to MO. Purify is bigger and stronger than any corner he's against. And he's not shy about dropping his shoulder into a LBs chest. That's 7 to 12 yards each time & eventually he will break one. Quote Link to comment
papersun87 Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 Just having him in the game changes the dynamic for a defense. If I was Coach Callahan, I'd have him as part of every formation except "goal line." And maybe even then once or twice. Quote Link to comment
Hunter94 Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 another quirk about cally, not having your best receiver in the game more than 60% of the plays. really, who knows how this guy thinks?? Quote Link to comment
huskerdude171 Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 There's no point to not have him out there. It seems like he's never in for consecutive snaps and if he is they probably won't throw to him anyway. And on 3rd and long plays they won't even put him in!!! That is some of the stupidest coaching decisions ever to not have your best receiver in the formation on a 3rd and long. And instead of him they have in receivers who drop the ball like Frantz Hardy who had a bad drop this week, Nunn who dropped a TD as well, and slow receivers like Peterson and Erickson. So pretty much they need to put him in there a lot more than they do, and make defenses notice him and get them off guard. But Callahan isn't smart enough to do that so I don't think it will change. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.