chamrocck Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 Player: Michael Thomas Hometown: Houston, TX Position: ATH Height: 5'11" Weight: 180 lbs. 40 time: 4.5 Visit Date: Scholarships offered: Nebraska, Missouri, Iowa State, Stanford, Northwestern, Penn State, Boise State, Rice Favorites: Stanford, Northwestern Rankings/Stars: Rivals: Bid Red Report: Assessing the talent: Versatile prospect has played QB/RB/WR/CB. Odds of becoming a Cornhusker: 15% We need to overcome his leaders. Scout link here talks about being impressed with Nebraska and his view of NU as a prestigious program. Article also mentions that we may be looking at him as a WR. Quote Link to comment
no_name_needed_2001 Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 Looking at who has offered....his favorites baffle me Quote Link to comment
MadcatNU Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 Looking at who has offered....his favorites baffle me Not if academics are important to you. If that is the case, his choices make a lot of sense. Quote Link to comment
BIGREDIOWAN Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 Looking at who has offered....his favorites baffle me Not if academics are important to you. If that is the case, his choices make a lot of sense. I agree that's the first thing I thought of. Quote Link to comment
zoogs Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 I still maintain that football players are not getting close to the academic experience at Stanford that their typical students are. In that sense, I really don't think there is much of an academic difference in Stanford and Nebraska, from a player's standpoint. Quote Link to comment
Hunter94 Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 I still maintain that football players are not getting close to the academic experience at Stanford that their typical students are. In that sense, I really don't think there is much of an academic difference in Stanford and Nebraska, from a player's standpoint. you are kidding, right? Quote Link to comment
zoogs Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 No. I mean, when you have to devote so much of your time to football, you're not getting the same education that the non-Division I athletes who are just students are getting. And if you really want a good education while being a Division I football player, then you can get a good education at Nebraska as well as at Stanford. In terms of student quality alone, yes, Stanford attracts top students. But look at the Scout link on him: He reports a 3.4 core GPA and a 950 SAT, which he is retaking in October. "Stanford told me they'd like me to get at least a 1200 on the SAT." A 3.4 core GPA is incredibly low in the Stanford pool, and a 950 SAT is absolutely unheard of. It's below the national average, in fact, and he's going to one of the top schools in the nation, a school where those well above the 99th percentile in standardized test scores routinely get rejected? They lower their academic standards for athletes, and that's a fact. Granted, the SAT is not the be-all, end-all of deterministic student evaluations, but a 1200 is still really, really unspectacular in the Stanford pool. Quote Link to comment
BIGREDIOWAN Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 No. I mean, when you have to devote so much of your time to football, you're not getting the same education that the non-Division I athletes who are just students are getting. And if you really want a good education while being a Division I football player, then you can get a good education at Nebraska as well as at Stanford. In terms of student quality alone, yes, Stanford attracts top students. But look at the Scout link on him: He reports a 3.4 core GPA and a 950 SAT, which he is retaking in October. "Stanford told me they'd like me to get at least a 1200 on the SAT." A 3.4 core GPA is incredibly low in the Stanford pool, and a 950 SAT is absolutely unheard of. It's below the national average, in fact, and he's going to one of the top schools in the nation, a school where those well above the 99th percentile in standardized test scores routinely get rejected? They lower their academic standards for athletes, and that's a fact. Granted, the SAT is not the be-all, end-all of deterministic student evaluations, but a 1200 is still really, really unspectacular in the Stanford pool. Let's not talk about SAT's is giving me flashbacks!!!! Quote Link to comment
chamrocck Posted December 14, 2007 Author Share Posted December 14, 2007 Has committed to Stanford. Quote Link to comment
BIGREDIOWAN Posted December 15, 2007 Share Posted December 15, 2007 Has committed to Stanford. You got all kinds of good news don't you!!!! Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.