Jump to content


Recommended Posts

I get what you're saying, but let's take a stroll down NU history lane. In 2003, we finished the year 10-3. BC strolls in in 2004 and we go 5-6. We gave him that year even though Pud promised us great things because it takes a year or two to get the new system in place and the players to make it work. If Iowa State is still winning 2-4 games in a year or two, then it's very debateable whether or not he's a good coach. I don't think too many people expect 8 to 10 wins next year here.

 

I was just rebutting the guy who said that Pelini would be a guarantee for 8-10 years and gave the examples of Mike Stoops and Gene Chizik. I don't believe this, as I believe whoever they bring in will need some transition time and Chizik should definitely not be defined a bad coach already, just that expecting a quick turnaround based on those two guys is faulty logic.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Visit the Sports Illustrated Husker site



×
×
  • Create New...