Rep The 402 Posted April 20, 2010 Author Share Posted April 20, 2010 Lets just go Independent. Quote Link to comment
Hunter94 Posted April 21, 2010 Share Posted April 21, 2010 the situation is one (or might become one) of either get left behind and fail, or leave the ones left behind to fail. well said... Quote Link to comment
Vince from ShamWOW Posted April 21, 2010 Share Posted April 21, 2010 the situation is one (or might become one) of either get left behind and fail, or leave the ones left behind to fail. Bullseye With Dan Beebe as commissioner - sticking with him would leave NU and all other teams behind to fail. Quote Link to comment
huKSer Posted April 21, 2010 Share Posted April 21, 2010 Most wins since 1970: Nebraska - 393 wins Ohio St. - 366 wins Oklahoma - 364 wins Michigan - 359 wins Penn St. - 357 wins 20 years NOT in the Big Can't Count - they were independent with a schedule much weaker than Notre Dumb most years 3 of the Top 5 teams are from the Big 10. Well I would be fat and lazy if I played Indiana, Northwestern, Perdon't, Illinois, Mich St, Minnesota and most years Iowa all the time Quote Link to comment
Nexus Posted April 21, 2010 Share Posted April 21, 2010 Most wins since 1970: Nebraska - 393 wins Ohio St. - 366 wins Oklahoma - 364 wins Michigan - 359 wins Penn St. - 357 wins 20 years NOT in the Big Can't Count - they were independent with a schedule much weaker than Notre Dumb most years 3 of the Top 5 teams are from the Big 10. Well I would be fat and lazy if I played Indiana, Northwestern, Perdon't, Illinois, Mich St, Minnesota and most years Iowa all the time So you're saying that playing against Iowa St., Mizzou, Kansas St., Kansas, Oklahoma St. and Colorado was that much tougher during the Big 8 years? 1 Quote Link to comment
huKSer Posted April 21, 2010 Share Posted April 21, 2010 Most wins since 1970: Nebraska - 393 wins Ohio St. - 366 wins Oklahoma - 364 wins Michigan - 359 wins Penn St. - 357 wins 20 years NOT in the Big Can't Count - they were independent with a schedule much weaker than Notre Dumb most years 3 of the Top 5 teams are from the Big 10. Well I would be fat and lazy if I played Indiana, Northwestern, Perdon't, Illinois, Mich St, Minnesota and most years Iowa all the time So you're saying that playing against Iowa St., Mizzou, Kansas St., Kansas, Oklahoma St. and Colorado was that much tougher during the Big 8 years? It would be interesting to compare the cumulative wins for the basement teams over that span. I would say NU + OU = Mich + OSU, but PSU not being in a conference for half the time screws comparisons. CU did finish third in the country in 1971 (and 3rd in the conference, BTW) and won a MNC. I'm not thinking any of those 7 did anything like that. And for 15 years, the Big 12 has had a significant upgrade with Texas Quote Link to comment
Nexus Posted April 21, 2010 Share Posted April 21, 2010 Most wins since 1970: Nebraska - 393 wins Ohio St. - 366 wins Oklahoma - 364 wins Michigan - 359 wins Penn St. - 357 wins 20 years NOT in the Big Can't Count - they were independent with a schedule much weaker than Notre Dumb most years 3 of the Top 5 teams are from the Big 10. Well I would be fat and lazy if I played Indiana, Northwestern, Perdon't, Illinois, Mich St, Minnesota and most years Iowa all the time So you're saying that playing against Iowa St., Mizzou, Kansas St., Kansas, Oklahoma St. and Colorado was that much tougher during the Big 8 years? It would be interesting to compare the cumulative wins for the basement teams over that span. I would say NU + OU = Mich + OSU, but PSU not being in a conference for half the time screws comparisons. CU did finish third in the country in 1971 (and 3rd in the conference, BTW) and won a MNC. I'm not thinking any of those 7 did anything like that. And for 15 years, the Big 12 has had a significant upgrade with Texas But I'm purposely not counting the Big 12 in all this since the larger portions of those wins are from the Big 8 era. I'll see what I can come up with because I'm curious to see what those other schools not named NU, OU, OSU, UM did during that era. Quote Link to comment
sd'sker Posted April 21, 2010 Share Posted April 21, 2010 Most wins since 1970: Nebraska - 393 wins Ohio St. - 366 wins Oklahoma - 364 wins Michigan - 359 wins Penn St. - 357 wins 20 years NOT in the Big Can't Count - they were independent with a schedule much weaker than Notre Dumb most years 3 of the Top 5 teams are from the Big 10. Well I would be fat and lazy if I played Indiana, Northwestern, Perdon't, Illinois, Mich St, Minnesota and most years Iowa all the time So you're saying that playing against Iowa St., Mizzou, Kansas St., Kansas, Oklahoma St. and Colorado was that much tougher during the Big 8 years? It would be interesting to compare the cumulative wins for the basement teams over that span. I would say NU + OU = Mich + OSU, but PSU not being in a conference for half the time screws comparisons. CU did finish third in the country in 1971 (and 3rd in the conference, BTW) and won a MNC. I'm not thinking any of those 7 did anything like that. And for 15 years, the Big 12 has had a significant upgrade with Texas But I'm purposely not counting the Big 12 in all this since the larger portions of those wins are from the Big 8 era. I'll see what I can come up with because I'm curious to see what those other schools not named NU, OU, OSU, UM did during that era. when looking at history, a win is a win. no one looks at bobby bowden and says, "well bobby was never in a top three conference, so his wins don't count". edit: what i am saying is I agree with nexus. Quote Link to comment
Nexus Posted April 21, 2010 Share Posted April 21, 2010 Well here it is. Total wins by each team from 1970-2009. The list doesn't include Nebraska, Oklahoma, Michigan, Ohio St., Wisconsin, Penn St. Colorado - 262 Iowa - 248 Michigan St. - 236 Oklahoma St. - 234 Mizzou - 217 Kansas St. - 214 Purdue - 214 Minnesota - 198 Illini - 196 Kansas - 195 Iowa St. - 185 Indiana - 170 Northwestern - 150 Big 8 (6 teams) = 1307 Big 10 (7 teams) = 1412 Quote Link to comment
Nexus Posted April 21, 2010 Share Posted April 21, 2010 FWIW, since Penn St. joined the Big 10 in 1993 they've won 148 games. Quote Link to comment
Danimal Posted April 21, 2010 Share Posted April 21, 2010 If the search for a member goes a ways and Neb is looking like a national power again I think we have shot. Quote Link to comment
Judoka Posted April 21, 2010 Share Posted April 21, 2010 If the search for a member goes a ways and Neb is looking like a national power again I think we have shot. I think the way the we travel as a fan base gives us a shot. Quote Link to comment
huKSer Posted April 21, 2010 Share Posted April 21, 2010 Well here it is. Total wins by each team from 1970-2009. The list doesn't include Nebraska, Oklahoma, Michigan, Ohio St., Wisconsin, Penn St. Big 8 (6 teams) = 1307 Big 10 (7 teams) = 1412 Big 8 (6 teams) = 1307 / 6 = 217.8 wins per team Big 10 (7 teams) = 1412 / 7 = 201.7 wins per team Quote Link to comment
Paperback Writer Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I think the misconception here is that some of you think that the Big Big 10 is only going to looking to expand by 1 school. I have to agree with the few folks out there, the Big 10 will take more than one and we are going to see a pretty big conference shake up for more than 1 conference in College Football. I just don't see the case for adding more than one school to the Big10. With 12 schools the Big10 gets the added revenue of a conference championship game. However, all the TV revenue is split 12 ways (the Big10 splits $$$ evenly). So a case can be made that although the pot is being split more ways, there's the added revenue from a championship game. What is the reasoning behind adding additional teams beyond 12? Unless the Big10 gains a significant TV market like Texas and aTm (and they are staying in the Big12), the dilution of revenue split 14 or 16 ways won't make up for any added revenue gained from new TV markets. I just don't see the money being there for anything beyond 12 teams. Not to mention the scheduling difficulties for football in a 14 or 16 team conference. It doesn't add up. Quote Link to comment
sd'sker Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I think the misconception here is that some of you think that the Big Big 10 is only going to looking to expand by 1 school. I have to agree with the few folks out there, the Big 10 will take more than one and we are going to see a pretty big conference shake up for more than 1 conference in College Football. I just don't see the case for adding more than one school to the Big10. With 12 schools the Big10 gets the added revenue of a conference championship game. However, all the TV revenue is split 12 ways (the Big10 splits $$$ evenly). So a case can be made that although the pot is being split more ways, there's the added revenue from a championship game. What is the reasoning behind adding additional teams beyond 12? Unless the Big10 gains a significant TV market like Texas and aTm (and they are staying in the Big12), the dilution of revenue split 14 or 16 ways won't make up for any added revenue gained from new TV markets. I just don't see the money being there for anything beyond 12 teams. Not to mention the scheduling difficulties for football in a 14 or 16 team conference. It doesn't add up. every team has their own fanbase and market. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.