corncraze Posted February 3, 2011 Share Posted February 3, 2011 A little surprised Florida was ahead of Cali. I would loved to see a little of states with the best 40 time average Quote Link to comment
MinnwiscowaSker Posted February 3, 2011 Share Posted February 3, 2011 I'm surprised to see Illinois at #10 and that Oregon only has 11 total. Quote Link to comment
RockyMountainOySker Posted February 3, 2011 Share Posted February 3, 2011 Love seeing these breakdowns. Thanks for posting! I find North Carolina and New Jersey surprisingly high. And like MinnsicowaSker said Oregon is way lower than I would have guessed. Notice how the entire B1G region is no where near the top??? Quote Link to comment
Nexus Posted February 3, 2011 Author Share Posted February 3, 2011 I chuckled a bit when I saw Alaska put out more D1 talent than 8 other states. Quote Link to comment
NUance Posted February 3, 2011 Share Posted February 3, 2011 I always find it amazing that New York state, the 3rd most populous state, ranks down around 20th in number of commits. I guess they don't play football in NYC. Quote Link to comment
robsker Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 I always find it amazing that New York state, the 3rd most populous state, ranks down around 20th in number of commits. I guess they don't play football in NYC. Me too. An emphasis thing, I guess. That explains the disproportionately high D1 players (relative to state population) for the states in the south --- sure Georgia is fairly populated but to be generating so many recruits... same for NC, SC, and Mississippi... Alabama too. The south owns football it would seem. The mountain west? Not so much so. Quote Link to comment
dylan Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 I always find it amazing that New York state, the 3rd most populous state, ranks down around 20th in number of commits. I guess they don't play football in NYC. Me too. An emphasis thing, I guess. That explains the disproportionately high D1 players (relative to state population) for the states in the south --- sure Georgia is fairly populated but to be generating so many recruits... same for NC, SC, and Mississippi... Alabama too. The south owns football it would seem. The mountain west? Not so much so. i think "demographics" have a lot more to do with the number of studs coming out of the south compared to other areas. (or to put it less delicately, there are more black people in the south than in other areas, and african americans tend to have more fast twitch muscle on average.) it is odd though how the big metro areas of the northeast tend to not produce as much football talent as you would expect. i've always guessed this was due to the popularity of basketball in urban areas. Quote Link to comment
Nexus Posted February 8, 2011 Author Share Posted February 8, 2011 Max Prep's Twitter: 158 out of the 372 Texas D1 commits stayed in the Lone Star State. 42% LINK Quote Link to comment
NUance Posted February 8, 2011 Share Posted February 8, 2011 Max Prep's Twitter: 158 out of the 372 Texas D1 commits stayed in the Lone Star State. 42% LINK About the same as us. 4/9 stayed in Nebraska = 44.4%. (Note: MaxPreps revised their numbers slightly since your first post. Nebr now has 9 D1 recruits.) Quote Link to comment
UGAHusker Posted February 8, 2011 Share Posted February 8, 2011 Sometimes I wish that I would have played HS football in Nebraska instead of Georgia. I bet it would have been easy. Quote Link to comment
NUance Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 *bump* Here's a pretty good article from scout.com on this same topic. It has stats for D1 signees cut three different ways. D1 by state. BCS by state. And D1 normalized for population. LINK Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.